09.11.2014 Views

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

171<br />

Analysis of surface air temperatures over Ireland from re-analysis data and<br />

observational data<br />

Priscilla A. Mooney 1 , Frank J. Mulligan 2 and Rowan Fealy 1<br />

1 Irish Climate Analysis and Research Units, National University of Ireland Maynooth, Kildare, Ireland.<br />

priscilla.a.mooney@nuim.ie<br />

2 Department of Experimental Physics, National University of Ireland Maynooth, Kildare, Ireland.<br />

1. Abstract<br />

Since the observational data used in both ERA-40 and<br />

NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis data are largely identical, it is<br />

frequently assumed that either dataset is equally valid in the<br />

assessment of climate models. However, comparisons of<br />

these two dataset shows that subtle differences do exist and<br />

it is important to compare them to observational data in the<br />

region of interest to determine which reanalysis dataset<br />

should be used.<br />

In this study, surface air temperatures at 2 m altitude<br />

predicted by ERA-40 and NCEP/NCAR reanalysis (NNRP-<br />

1) have been compared with observations at eleven synoptic<br />

stations in Ireland over the period 1958-2000. Both<br />

reanalysis datasets show good agreement with the observed<br />

data and with each other. Slopes of the least-squares line to<br />

scatter plots of reanalysis data to observational data show<br />

small differences between the two reanalyses, with NNRP-1<br />

slopes and ERA-40 slopes ranging between (0.75-0.97)<br />

±0.01 and (0.79-1.0) ±0.01, respectively. Summary<br />

statistics and the monthly mean temperatures over the 1979-<br />

2000 period showed that both reanalyses predicted<br />

significantly warmer winters than the observations which<br />

caused the slopes of the best fit lines to be consistently less<br />

than unity.<br />

2. Introduction<br />

Over the past decade reanalysis data has found widespread<br />

application in many areas of research ranging from studies<br />

of climatic trends (Ciccarelli et al, 2008) and climate<br />

modeling (Fealy and Sweeney, 2007) to estimation of<br />

renewable energy resources (Henfridsson et al, 2007). It is<br />

advantageous to use reanalysis data in certain research areas<br />

where observational data is sparse or when knowledge of the<br />

state of the atmosphere on a uniform grid is required.<br />

Some of the most well known reanalysis data sets are<br />

NCEP/NCAR (NNRP-1), NCEP/DOE (NNRP-2), ERA-15,<br />

ERA-40 and ERA interim. NNRP-1 and ERA-40 are two of<br />

the most widely used reanalysis archives. Although they use<br />

similar observational data, previous studies have shown<br />

subtle differences between them (Escoffier and Provost,<br />

1998; Li et al., 2004; Gleiser et al., 2005; Ruti et al., 2008).<br />

Simmons et al., 2004 compared surface air temperature<br />

anomalies from CRUTEM2v with ERA-40 and NNRP-1.<br />

They found that ERA-40 showed better agreement with<br />

CRUTEM2v than NNRP-1 over the time periods 1958-2001<br />

and 1979-2001. In addition they reported closer agreement<br />

between ERA-40 and CRUTEM2v over the period 1979-<br />

2001 compared with the period 1958-1979. This was<br />

attributed to the greater observational coverage after 1979.<br />

3. Surface Temperature Datasets<br />

NNRP-1 reanalysis data was produced by the National<br />

Centers for Environmental Predication (NCEP) in<br />

collaboration with the National Center for Atmospheric<br />

Research (NCAR). The assimilation system used in the<br />

NCEP/NCAR reanalysis is described in detail in Kalnay et<br />

al., 1996. The NNRP-1 data used in this study was obtained<br />

from the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado,<br />

USA <strong>web</strong> site at http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/.<br />

ERA-40 data was produced by the European Center for<br />

Medium range Weather Forecasting (Uppala et al, 2005)<br />

in collaboration with several other institutions with an<br />

interest in climate analysis and weather forecasting. The<br />

ERA-40 data used in this study was obtained from the<br />

ECMWF data server (http://data.ecmwf.int/data/).<br />

The observed station data used in this study for the period<br />

1958-2000 was obtained from Met Éireann, the Irish<br />

national meteorological service, for 11 synoptic weather<br />

stations. The synoptic stations, which are geographically<br />

dispersed around Ireland (figure 1), represent mixture of<br />

both coastal and inland locations. This study did not<br />

perform any homogeneity analysis of the data. However,<br />

the data is from the synoptic network which is manned by<br />

experienced meteorological officers and the data is<br />

considered to be of high quality.<br />

Figure 1. Map of Ireland showing the location of the<br />

eleven meteorological stations and the marine buoys M1<br />

and M4. The map is overlaid with grids for NNRP (red ---<br />

line) and ERA-40 (blue… lines).<br />

4. Collocation Method<br />

Spatially, the parameter values in the reanalysis data sets<br />

represent the value of that parameter in a ‘grid box’<br />

centred on the geographic coordinates given in the dataset.<br />

This presents a difficulty when comparing the station data<br />

with the reanalysis data, since the station data represents a<br />

single site within a grid box. Additional complications are<br />

introduced by the fact that the grid sizes in ERA-40 and<br />

NNRP-1 are different, the grid centres in the two<br />

reanalysis data sets are not coincident and the location of a<br />

station in the grid box can vary from the centre of the grid<br />

box to its edge. This is illustrated in figure 1 where the<br />

grids used by ERA-40 and NNRP-1 are plotted together<br />

with the location of the stations and marine buoys.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!