234 Figure 2. Difference between "low-ice" and "highice" years of simulated mean sea-ice drift velocity during summer (June to September). For clarity reasons, only every fifth difference vector is displayed. Karcher, M. J., Gerdes, R., Kauker, F., Köberle, C., Arctic warming: Evolution and spreading of the 1990s warm event in the Nordic seas and the Arctic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 3034, doi:10.1029/2001JC001265, 2003. Kauker, F., Gerdes, R., Karcher, M., Köberle, C., Lieser, J. L., Variability of Arctic and North Atlantic sea ice: A combined analysis of model results and observations from 1978 to 2001, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 3182, doi:10.1029/2002JC001573, 2003. Rinke, A., Gerdes, R., Dethloff, K., Kandlbinder, T., Karcher, M., Kauker, F., Frickenhaus, S., Köberle, C., Hiller, W., A case study of the anomalous Arctic sea ice conditions during 1990: Insights from coupled and uncoupled regional climate model simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4275, doi:10.1029/2002JD003146, 2003. In order to achieve a realistic regional distribution of sea-ice in late summer, it requires that the coupled model reproduces the observed atmospheric circulation during the preceding summer months. Unrealistic sea-ice cover, in turn, may favor model deviations in the atmospheric circulation, but these deviations can clearly differ in their strength, probably in consequence of regional feedback processes. It is a future task to identify the key regions in the Arctic where a more realistic simulation of such feedback processes is important. References Christensen, J. H., Christensen, O. B., Lopez, P., van Meijgaard, E., Botzet, M., The HIRHAM4 regional atmospheric climate model, DMI Sci. Rep. 96-4, Dan. Meteorol. Inst., Copenhagen, Denmark, 51 pp., 1996. Dethloff, K., Rinke, A., Lehmann, R., Christensen, J. H., Botzet, M., Machenhauer, B., Regional climate model of the Arctic atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 23401-23422, 1996. Dorn, W., Dethloff, K., Rinke, A., Frickenhaus, S., Gerdes, R., Karcher, M., Kauker, F., Sensitivities and uncertainties in a coupled regional atmosphere-ocean-ice model with respect to the simulation of Arctic sea ice, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10118, doi:10.1029/2006JD007814, 2007. Dorn, W., Dethloff, K., Rinke, A., Kurgansky, M., The recent decline of the Arctic summer sea-ice cover in the context of internal climate variability, Open Atmos. Sci. J., 2, 91-100, doi:10.2174/1874282300802010091, 2008a. Dorn, W., Dethloff, K., Rinke, A., Improved simulation of feedbacks between atmosphere and sea ice over the Arctic Ocean in a coupled regional climate model, Ocean Model., submitted, 2008b. Holland, M. M., Bitz, C. M., Polar amplification of climate change in coupled models, Clim. Dyn., 21, 221-232, doi:10.1007/s00382-003-0332-6, 2003.
235 Arctic regional coupled downscaling of recent and possible future climates R. Döscher*, T. Königk*, K. Wyser,* H. E. M. Meier** and P. Pemberton*** *SMHI/Rossby Centre, **SMHI and Univ. Stockholm, ***SMHI, ralf.doescher@smhi.se 1. A regional coupled ocean-sea ice-atmosphere model of the Arctic SMHI/Rossby Centre has developed a regional coupled ocean-sea ice-atmosphere model of the Arctic (The Rossby Centre Atmosphere Ocean model RCAO). After validation of recent climate representation, first regional climate scenario experiments have been carried out based on two global scenario simulations (ECHAM5/MPI-OM and BCM) and the emission scenario A1B. predictability of sea ice extent is supported by northeasterly winds from the Arctic ocean to Scandinavia. 3. Regional Arctic scenario downscaling The regional scenario downscaling exercise has been set up as a set of scenario experiments covering the role of different processes and forcing on possible future climates. Initially, the regional scenarios have been run under different treatments of sea surface salinity and lateral boundary conditions. First results indicate that occurrence of rapid change events in the Arctic are very much dependent on the hemisphere-scale atmospheric circulation. The local response in the regional scenarios tends to be stronger than in the global scenarios. The RCAO Arctic model domain for the ocean (RCO, blue) and the atmosphere (RCA, red), together with the ocean topography. 2. Validation and Predictability Within the EU-DAMOCLES project, validation of recent climate has been carried out under the conditions of the ECMWF reanalysis (ERA-40) and control periods of the global scenario simulations. Central validation parameters are the Arctic sea ice parameters and its relation with large scale atmospheric circulation. Significant correlations between the winter North Atlantic Oscillation index and the summer Arctic sea ice thickness and summer sea ice extent are found in agreement with observations. The ice thickness trend is found to be related to large scale atmospheric forcing. In an ensemble experiment, Arctic predictability has been assessed in order to quantify uncertainty due to nonlinear interannual variability generated internally within the Arctic coupled system. Results indicate that the variability generated by the external forcing is more important in most regions than the internally generated variability. However, both are in the same order of magnitude. Local areas such as the Northern Greenland coast together with Fram Straits and parts of the Greenland Sea show a strong importance of internally generated variability, which is associated with wind direction variability due to interaction with atmospheric dynamics on the Greenland ice sheet. High
- Page 1:
2 nd International Lund RCM Worksho
- Page 5 and 6:
Associated Organisations ENSEMBLES
- Page 7:
Preface This Second Lund Regional-s
- Page 10 and 11:
II High-resolution dynamical downsc
- Page 12 and 13:
IV Investigation of added value at
- Page 14 and 15:
VI Soil organic layer: Implications
- Page 16 and 17:
VIII Session 4: Regional Observatio
- Page 18 and 19:
X Predicting water resources in Wes
- Page 20 and 21:
XII The impact of atmospheric therm
- Page 22 and 23:
XIV Observation and simulation with
- Page 24 and 25:
XVI Favot F .......................
- Page 26 and 27:
XVIII Ruoho-Airola T...............
- Page 28 and 29:
2 5. Influence of SN on the Ensembl
- Page 30 and 31:
4 (+/- 5 days) were used to increas
- Page 32 and 33:
6 Dynamical downscaling: Assessment
- Page 34 and 35:
8 Improvement of long-term integrat
- Page 36 and 37:
10 air temperature annual cycle (Fi
- Page 38 and 39:
12 Sensitivity study of CRCM-simula
- Page 40 and 41:
14 Regional precipitation anomalies
- Page 42 and 43:
16 Assessment of precipitation as s
- Page 44 and 45:
18 The Asian summer monsoon in ERA4
- Page 46 and 47:
20 Added value of limited area mode
- Page 48 and 49:
22 Sensitivity of CRCM basin annual
- Page 50 and 51:
24 High-resolution dynamical downsc
- Page 52 and 53:
26 There is nevertheless a large ag
- Page 54 and 55:
28 technique, as it is based on the
- Page 56 and 57:
30 4. Heating mechanism In order to
- Page 58 and 59:
32 The geographical distribution of
- Page 60 and 61:
34 The CCM scheme reveals a distinc
- Page 62 and 63:
36 Performance of pattern scaling i
- Page 64 and 65:
38 Evaluation of the analyzed large
- Page 66 and 67:
40 Sensitivity studies with a stati
- Page 68 and 69:
42 5SL, the results suggest that 5S
- Page 70 and 71:
44 are however occasional episodes
- Page 72 and 73:
46 this season, as well as the high
- Page 74 and 75:
48 Figure 1. Precipitation rate (mm
- Page 76 and 77:
50 References Biau. G., E. Zorita,
- Page 78 and 79:
52 Investigation of regional climat
- Page 80 and 81:
54 Selected examples of the added v
- Page 82 and 83:
56 The climate change in Europe sim
- Page 84 and 85:
58 Simulation of South Asian summer
- Page 86 and 87:
7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 60 For the climato
- Page 88 and 89:
62 precipitation field was more clo
- Page 90 and 91:
64 3. Results Fig. 2 shows the anal
- Page 92 and 93:
66 Is the position of the model dom
- Page 94 and 95:
68 question E. Finally a 10-member
- Page 96 and 97:
Figure 2. Same as in Fig.1 but for
- Page 98 and 99:
72 Will, A., M. Baldauf, B. Rockel,
- Page 100 and 101:
74 ( ) with i = 1,K,n; j = 1,K,m;
- Page 102 and 103:
76 Investigation of precipitation o
- Page 104 and 105:
78 Impacts of the spectral nudging
- Page 106 and 107:
80 Extremes and predictability in t
- Page 108 and 109:
82 Large-scale skill in regional cl
- Page 110 and 111:
84 Figure 3: As Figure 1 but for Wi
- Page 112 and 113:
86 The models capture this pattern
- Page 114 and 115:
88 of the simulations due to the di
- Page 117 and 118:
91 Examining the relative roles con
- Page 119 and 120:
93 Dynamical coupling of the HIRHAM
- Page 121 and 122:
95 A parameterization of aircraft i
- Page 123 and 124:
97 Stratospheric variability and it
- Page 125 and 126:
99 Effects of numerical methods on
- Page 127 and 128:
101 Development of a climate model
- Page 129 and 130:
103 Study of the capability of the
- Page 131 and 132:
105 Evaluation of the land surface
- Page 133 and 134:
107 Simulation of the precipitation
- Page 135 and 136:
109 Climate simulations over North
- Page 137 and 138:
111 Soil organic layer: Implication
- Page 139 and 140:
113 4. Results The method how to do
- Page 141 and 142:
115 Figure 1. Observed (a) and simu
- Page 143 and 144:
117 Evaluation of the Rossby Centre
- Page 145 and 146:
119 Simulating aerosols in the regi
- Page 147 and 148:
121 Moisture availability and the r
- Page 149 and 150:
123 Temperature and precipitation s
- Page 151 and 152:
125 4. Preliminary results for down
- Page 153 and 154:
127 a) Knutson, T.R., J.J. Sirutis,
- Page 155 and 156:
129 Effects of variations in climat
- Page 157 and 158:
131 3.2. Precipitation The ensemble
- Page 159 and 160:
133 knowledge is essential to asses
- Page 161 and 162:
135 pronounced biases in the simula
- Page 163 and 164:
137 variability was concentrated at
- Page 165 and 166:
139 Investigation of ‘Hurricane K
- Page 167 and 168:
141 Evaluation of seasonal forecast
- Page 169 and 170:
143 NASH J. E., SUTCLIFFE J. V., 19
- Page 171 and 172:
145 Climate change assessment over
- Page 173 and 174:
147 For relative operating characte
- Page 175 and 176:
149 responsible for the excessive s
- Page 177 and 178:
151 and 30km). Domains D1 (90 and 6
- Page 179 and 180:
153 can be seen in Fig. 2, where th
- Page 181 and 182:
155 High-resolution simulation of a
- Page 183 and 184:
157 MesoClim - A mesoscale alpine c
- Page 185 and 186:
159 Observed and modeled extremes i
- Page 187 and 188:
161 analyzed the surface wind behav
- Page 189 and 190:
163 summer particularly in the Paci
- Page 191 and 192:
165 since 01.01.2004. For the Meteo
- Page 193 and 194:
167 Wind, m/s 12 10 8 6 4 2 Vilsand
- Page 195 and 196:
169 heterogeneity. For example, lar
- Page 197 and 198:
171 Analysis of surface air tempera
- Page 199 and 200:
173 Environmental database and the
- Page 201 and 202:
Climate change and water pollution
- Page 203 and 204:
177 During summer, winds over the M
- Page 205 and 206:
179 followed nearly the correct pat
- Page 207 and 208:
181 Verification of simulated near
- Page 209 and 210: 183 The North American Regional Cli
- Page 211 and 212: 185 An atmosphere-ocean regional cl
- Page 213 and 214: 187 different rainfall characterist
- Page 215 and 216: 189 with increasing temperature. Mo
- Page 217 and 218: 191 Inter-comparison of Asian monso
- Page 219 and 220: 193 On the validation of RCMs in te
- Page 221 and 222: 195 AMMA-Model Intercomparison Proj
- Page 223 and 224: 197 parameterization are used in th
- Page 225 and 226: 199 Evaluation of European snow cov
- Page 227 and 228: 201 Projections of eastern Mediterr
- Page 229 and 230: 203 Atmospheric river induced heavy
- Page 231 and 232: 205 CLARIS project: Towards climate
- Page 233 and 234: 207 Influence of soil moisture init
- Page 235 and 236: 209 Projection of the Changes in th
- Page 237 and 238: 211 Regional climate model studies
- Page 239 and 240: 213 ENSEMBLES regional climate mode
- Page 241 and 242: 215 Assessing the performance of se
- Page 243 and 244: 217 Applying the Rossby Centre Regi
- Page 245 and 246: 219 Interactions between European s
- Page 247 and 248: 221 ALADIN-Climate/CZ simulation of
- Page 249 and 250: 223 experiment of recreating the pr
- Page 251 and 252: 225 Figure 2. the 10-year averaged
- Page 253 and 254: 227 Use of regional climate models
- Page 255 and 256: 229 Wave estimations using winds fr
- Page 257 and 258: 231 Figure 1. Model domain for the
- Page 259: 233 A coupled regional climate mode
- Page 263 and 264: 237 Convection-resolving regional c
- Page 265 and 266: 239 4. Outlook Currently a coupled
- Page 267 and 268: 241 distribution within the Netherl
- Page 269 and 270: 243 Very high-resolution regional c
- Page 271 and 272: 245 Impact of convective parameteri
- Page 273 and 274: 247 Development of a regional ocean
- Page 275 and 276: 249 Regional climate change impact
- Page 277 and 278: 251 River runoff projection of futu
- Page 279 and 280: 253 Application of regional-scale c
- Page 281 and 282: 255 Local air mass dependence of ex
- Page 283 and 284: 257 Impact of vegetation on the sim
- Page 285 and 286: 259 Climate change impacts on the w
- Page 287 and 288: 261 Influence of soil moisture-near
- Page 289 and 290: 263 Forest damage in a changing cli
- Page 291 and 292: 265 Future challenges for regional
- Page 293 and 294: 267 Linking climate factors and ada
- Page 295 and 296: 269 GCMs. In the end of the 21 st c
- Page 297 and 298: 271 Climate change impacts on extre
- Page 299 and 300: 273 Winter storms with high loss po
- Page 301 and 302: 275 The impact of land use change a
- Page 303 and 304: 277 6. Analysis of Results (Rain) T
- Page 305 and 306: 279 (a) (b) Figure 3. Impact of veg
- Page 307 and 308: 281 that cold (Fig. 5). Winter temp
- Page 309 and 310: 283 Streamflow in the upper Mississ
- Page 311 and 312:
285 Dynamical downscaling of urban
- Page 313 and 314:
287 Souma, K., K. Tanaka, E. Nakaki
- Page 315 and 316:
289 In April 2000, the fire emissio
- Page 317 and 318:
291 Impacts of vegetation on global
- Page 321 and 322:
International BALTEX Secretariat Pu
- Page 323:
No. 34: BALTEX Phase II 2003 - 2012