09.11.2014 Views

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

Low (web) Quality - BALTEX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

290<br />

Validation of RCM simulations using a conceptual runoff model<br />

Claudia Teutschbein, Jan Seibert<br />

Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden,<br />

claudia.teutschbein@natgeo.su.se<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Hydrological modeling for climate change impact<br />

assessment implies simulations using temperature and<br />

precipitation series generated by climate models, e.g.<br />

regional climate models (RCMs). The ability to correctly<br />

reproduce current conditions provides confidence in the<br />

simulation of future scenarios. While simulated temperature<br />

and precipitation series can be compared directly to<br />

observations, we were in this study also interested in the<br />

combined effect on runoff simulations. In this study we,<br />

therefore, investigated how well current conditions were<br />

reproduced for both temperature, precipitation and runoff for<br />

5 Swedish catchments.<br />

A comparison of RCM control-run data with observations<br />

was performed for precipitation and temperature. Moreover,<br />

the runoff simulated with these time series has been<br />

compared with measured values. Reanalysis data was also<br />

included in the investigation for comparison.<br />

2. Methods<br />

The analysis has been performed for 5 Swedish catchments<br />

with areas of 150 to 300 km 2 . These catchments, namely<br />

Ostträsket (OST), Tännån (TAN), Fyrisån (FYR), Emån<br />

(EMA) and Rönne Å (RON), represent different typical<br />

climatic conditions and land-use types in Sweden (Fig. 1).<br />

RCM precipitation and temperature data from 16 different<br />

RCMs – all driven by ERA40 reanalysis data - were<br />

obtained from the ENSEMBLES EU project.<br />

After comparing the results of each RCM with observed data<br />

in terms of accuracy and frequency of extreme events (Fig.<br />

2), spatial and temporal differences were analyzed as well.<br />

For comparison, reanalysis data (ERA-MESAN, ERA-<br />

INTERIM) were also included.<br />

In a second step, the best performing RCMs were picked for<br />

further hydrological investigations. The runoff in the study<br />

catchments was simulated with the conceptual runoff model<br />

HBV, forced by the RCM data as well as reanalysis time<br />

series. This approach is advantageous because hydrological<br />

effects of inaccuracies of simulated precipitation and<br />

temperature from the RCMs can be assessed. Furthermore,<br />

the catchment runoff integrates over a larger area which<br />

corresponds better to the RCM grid data than meteorological<br />

point measurements.<br />

Figure 1. Catchment areas in Sweden.<br />

Figure 2. Ability of several RCMs to simulate<br />

monthly climate parameters for Ostträsket. (a) max<br />

precipitation, (b) max temperature, (c) sum<br />

precipitation, (d) min temperature.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!