28.01.2015 Views

2008 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

2008 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

2008 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Friday, April 4-2:45 pm<br />

Paper<br />

Paper<br />

Paper<br />

Disc.<br />

The Disincentive to Converge: Reconsidering the Lincoln-<br />

Douglas Debates<br />

Through an exploration of the Lincoln-Douglas debates, I identify<br />

the conditions under which convergence to the median voter is a<br />

suboptimal solution for an office-seeking candidate.<br />

Darin DeWitt, University of California, Los Angeles<br />

darin.dewitt@gmail.com<br />

Big Parties under Proportional Representation<br />

Elections under PR result in more parties than under plurality, but<br />

not drastically more. Why aren’t there more parties under PR<br />

Larger parties promote more efficient policy compromises, and are<br />

more likely to be part of winning coalitions.<br />

Kathleen Bawn, University of California, Los Angeles<br />

kbawn@polisci.ucla.edu<br />

Solidarity or Competition Dynamics Among Social Movements<br />

I propose a game theoretic model where social movement groups<br />

decide to build coalition or compete with other depending on the<br />

political opportunity structure and the extent to which their claims<br />

overlap.<br />

Baran Han, Cornell University<br />

bh84@cornell.edu<br />

Adam J. Ramey, University of Rochester<br />

adam.ramey@rochester.edu<br />

39-8 THE PERSONAL AND PLEBISCITARY<br />

PRESIDENCIES<br />

Room PDR 7 on the 3rd Floor, Fri at 2:45 pm<br />

Chair Justin S. Vaughn, Cleveland State University<br />

j.s.vaughn@csuohio.edu<br />

Paper Strategic Leaders: Identifying Successful Presidential<br />

Leadership of Public Opinion<br />

In this article, we reevaluate opinion leadership by examining<br />

several strategic options and multiple political conditions under<br />

which the president might be influencing opinion movement.<br />

Brandon Rottinghaus, University of Houston<br />

bjrottinghaus@uh.edu<br />

Paper A New Understanding of Presidential Responsiveness with<br />

Citizens' Actions<br />

This paper reshapes the way we analyze presidential responsiveness<br />

by going beyond public opinion to directly analyze citizens’<br />

political behavior and the President's response to these actions from<br />

1954-1992.<br />

Daniel Gillion, University of Rochester<br />

dgillion@mail.rochester.edu<br />

Paper The Good, The Bad, and The Active Negative Personality as<br />

Regime Builder<br />

We examine the relationship between personality and context in<br />

presidential leadership, arguing that a range of outcomes is possible<br />

for active negative regime builders. Jackson's and Cleveland's (II)<br />

presidencies serve as examples.<br />

Adam S. Myers, University of Texas, Austin<br />

asm752@gov.utexas.edu<br />

Curtis W. Nichols, University of Texas, Austin<br />

curtnichols@mail.utexas.edu<br />

Paper The George W. Bush Presidency and Washington Governance<br />

What are the distinctive features of the George W. Bush<br />

administration's approach to Washington governance This paper<br />

explores the administration's governing style regarding Congress,<br />

the executive branch and federal courts.<br />

Steven E. Schier, Carleton College<br />

sschier@carleton.edu<br />

Paper<br />

Disc.<br />

Professional Reputation and Public Prestige of the President:<br />

Bush II Over Time<br />

This paper examines the relationship between professional<br />

reputation, public prestige, and other influential variables in the case<br />

of George W. Bush, and also considers the economy, events and<br />

crises taking place during Bush’s term in office.<br />

Jonathan C. Young, West Virginia University<br />

jcyoung@mail.wvu.edu<br />

Laurie L. Rice, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville<br />

larice@siue.edu<br />

Justin S. Vaughn, Cleveland State University<br />

j.s.vaughn@csuohio.edu<br />

40-301 POSTER SESSION: LEGISLATIVE POLITICS:<br />

INSTITUTIONS<br />

Room Grand on the 4th Floor, Fri at 2:45 pm<br />

Poster 5 The Influence of Special Rules on Legislating Process: Queenof-the-Hill<br />

as a Case<br />

In this paper, I study how queen-of-the-hill rule influence the voting<br />

patterns of members of Congress.<br />

Jianying Wang, University of Missouri, Columbia<br />

jwmq3@mizzou.edu<br />

Poster 6 A Forthcoming Disaster: Sacramento Delta Public Policy<br />

Failures<br />

There is no national disaster insurance program to provide for cost<br />

recovery for structural losses resulting from events like hurricanes<br />

and flooding. It is essential that Congress and State Legislatures<br />

enact a national disaster insurance policy.<br />

Allen Kingsley Settle, California Polytechnic State University<br />

asettle@calpoly.edu<br />

Poster 7 The Legislative Politics of Federal Higher Education Funding<br />

Since 1940<br />

This paper presents an analysis of the factors that have shaped the<br />

federal higher education funding agenda in the last sixty-five years,<br />

identifying five factors that have provided the impetus behind the<br />

passage of funding policies since WWII.<br />

Jayanti J. Owens, Princeton University<br />

jowens@princeton.edu<br />

Poster 8 <strong>Political</strong> Partisanship and Statesmanship<br />

We retrieve the virtue of statesmanship from conservative<br />

ideological misapporpriations and argue that the excessively<br />

partisan nature of American politics is having a detrimental effect<br />

on the capacity of our political leaders to become statesmen.<br />

Gordon A. Babst, Chapman University<br />

gbabst@chapman.edu<br />

James Moore, Chapman University<br />

moore113@chapman.edu<br />

Poster 9 Distributional Impacts of Malapportionment in the House of<br />

Representatives<br />

Does malapportionment in the US House lead to bias in<br />

the distribution of funding to states Using a difference in<br />

differences approach, I exploit changes in representation due to<br />

reapportionment to test the effect of House representation on<br />

funding.<br />

Kelly T. Rader, Columbia University<br />

ktr2102@columbia.edu<br />

217

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!