2008 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2008 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2008 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Friday, April 4-2:45 pm<br />
Paper<br />
Paper<br />
Paper<br />
Disc.<br />
The Disincentive to Converge: Reconsidering the Lincoln-<br />
Douglas Debates<br />
Through an exploration of the Lincoln-Douglas debates, I identify<br />
the conditions under which convergence to the median voter is a<br />
suboptimal solution for an office-seeking candidate.<br />
Darin DeWitt, University of California, Los Angeles<br />
darin.dewitt@gmail.com<br />
Big Parties under Proportional Representation<br />
Elections under PR result in more parties than under plurality, but<br />
not drastically more. Why aren’t there more parties under PR<br />
Larger parties promote more efficient policy compromises, and are<br />
more likely to be part of winning coalitions.<br />
Kathleen Bawn, University of California, Los Angeles<br />
kbawn@polisci.ucla.edu<br />
Solidarity or Competition Dynamics Among Social Movements<br />
I propose a game theoretic model where social movement groups<br />
decide to build coalition or compete with other depending on the<br />
political opportunity structure and the extent to which their claims<br />
overlap.<br />
Baran Han, Cornell University<br />
bh84@cornell.edu<br />
Adam J. Ramey, University of Rochester<br />
adam.ramey@rochester.edu<br />
39-8 THE PERSONAL AND PLEBISCITARY<br />
PRESIDENCIES<br />
Room PDR 7 on the 3rd Floor, Fri at 2:45 pm<br />
Chair Justin S. Vaughn, Cleveland State University<br />
j.s.vaughn@csuohio.edu<br />
Paper Strategic Leaders: Identifying Successful Presidential<br />
Leadership of Public Opinion<br />
In this article, we reevaluate opinion leadership by examining<br />
several strategic options and multiple political conditions under<br />
which the president might be influencing opinion movement.<br />
Brandon Rottinghaus, University of Houston<br />
bjrottinghaus@uh.edu<br />
Paper A New Understanding of Presidential Responsiveness with<br />
Citizens' Actions<br />
This paper reshapes the way we analyze presidential responsiveness<br />
by going beyond public opinion to directly analyze citizens’<br />
political behavior and the President's response to these actions from<br />
1954-1992.<br />
Daniel Gillion, University of Rochester<br />
dgillion@mail.rochester.edu<br />
Paper The Good, The Bad, and The Active Negative Personality as<br />
Regime Builder<br />
We examine the relationship between personality and context in<br />
presidential leadership, arguing that a range of outcomes is possible<br />
for active negative regime builders. Jackson's and Cleveland's (II)<br />
presidencies serve as examples.<br />
Adam S. Myers, University of Texas, Austin<br />
asm752@gov.utexas.edu<br />
Curtis W. Nichols, University of Texas, Austin<br />
curtnichols@mail.utexas.edu<br />
Paper The George W. Bush Presidency and Washington Governance<br />
What are the distinctive features of the George W. Bush<br />
administration's approach to Washington governance This paper<br />
explores the administration's governing style regarding Congress,<br />
the executive branch and federal courts.<br />
Steven E. Schier, Carleton College<br />
sschier@carleton.edu<br />
Paper<br />
Disc.<br />
Professional Reputation and Public Prestige of the President:<br />
Bush II Over Time<br />
This paper examines the relationship between professional<br />
reputation, public prestige, and other influential variables in the case<br />
of George W. Bush, and also considers the economy, events and<br />
crises taking place during Bush’s term in office.<br />
Jonathan C. Young, West Virginia University<br />
jcyoung@mail.wvu.edu<br />
Laurie L. Rice, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville<br />
larice@siue.edu<br />
Justin S. Vaughn, Cleveland State University<br />
j.s.vaughn@csuohio.edu<br />
40-301 POSTER SESSION: LEGISLATIVE POLITICS:<br />
INSTITUTIONS<br />
Room Grand on the 4th Floor, Fri at 2:45 pm<br />
Poster 5 The Influence of Special Rules on Legislating Process: Queenof-the-Hill<br />
as a Case<br />
In this paper, I study how queen-of-the-hill rule influence the voting<br />
patterns of members of Congress.<br />
Jianying Wang, University of Missouri, Columbia<br />
jwmq3@mizzou.edu<br />
Poster 6 A Forthcoming Disaster: Sacramento Delta Public Policy<br />
Failures<br />
There is no national disaster insurance program to provide for cost<br />
recovery for structural losses resulting from events like hurricanes<br />
and flooding. It is essential that Congress and State Legislatures<br />
enact a national disaster insurance policy.<br />
Allen Kingsley Settle, California Polytechnic State University<br />
asettle@calpoly.edu<br />
Poster 7 The Legislative Politics of Federal Higher Education Funding<br />
Since 1940<br />
This paper presents an analysis of the factors that have shaped the<br />
federal higher education funding agenda in the last sixty-five years,<br />
identifying five factors that have provided the impetus behind the<br />
passage of funding policies since WWII.<br />
Jayanti J. Owens, Princeton University<br />
jowens@princeton.edu<br />
Poster 8 <strong>Political</strong> Partisanship and Statesmanship<br />
We retrieve the virtue of statesmanship from conservative<br />
ideological misapporpriations and argue that the excessively<br />
partisan nature of American politics is having a detrimental effect<br />
on the capacity of our political leaders to become statesmen.<br />
Gordon A. Babst, Chapman University<br />
gbabst@chapman.edu<br />
James Moore, Chapman University<br />
moore113@chapman.edu<br />
Poster 9 Distributional Impacts of Malapportionment in the House of<br />
Representatives<br />
Does malapportionment in the US House lead to bias in<br />
the distribution of funding to states Using a difference in<br />
differences approach, I exploit changes in representation due to<br />
reapportionment to test the effect of House representation on<br />
funding.<br />
Kelly T. Rader, Columbia University<br />
ktr2102@columbia.edu<br />
217