2008 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2008 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2008 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Sunday, April 6-10:00 am<br />
Disc.<br />
Donald David Arthur Schaefer, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh<br />
don7@myuw.net<br />
21-14 IDEOLOGY, PARTIES, AND PARTISANSHIP<br />
Room Salon 2 on the 3rd Floor, Sun at 10:00 am<br />
Chair Francis Neely, San Francisco State University<br />
fneely@sfsu.edu<br />
Paper Ideology, Identity, and Partisanship<br />
Explores how political ideology functions as a group social<br />
identification. Uses Social Identity Theory to better illuminate<br />
the relationship between ideology and issue positions and the<br />
relationship between ideology and partisanship.<br />
Steven Greene, North Carolina State University<br />
steven.greene@ncsu.edu<br />
Melinda Jackson, San Jose State University<br />
mjackson@email.sjsu.edu<br />
Kyle Saunders, Colorado State University<br />
Kyle.Saunders@ColoState.EDU<br />
Paper Ideological Asymmetries in the American Party System<br />
Finds that Republican partisans are more likely to share the<br />
political outlook of their party than Democratic partisans. Traces<br />
implications for theories of party policy reputations, party signals,<br />
and the dimensional structure of public opinion.<br />
Paul M. Sniderman, Stanford University<br />
paulms@stanford.edu<br />
Michael Tomz, Stanford University<br />
tomz@stanford.edu<br />
Robert P. Van Houweling, University of California, Berkeley<br />
rpvh@berkeley.edu<br />
Paper Bias in Perceptions of <strong>Political</strong> Knowledge<br />
This paper examines the characteristics of individuals that make<br />
them appear to know more about politics than they actually do and<br />
explores possible reasons for these biases.<br />
John B. Ryan, University of California, Davis<br />
jbrryan@ucdavis.edu<br />
Disc. Francis Neely, San Francisco State University<br />
fneely@sfsu.edu<br />
23-7 E-CAMPAIGNING: MOVING THE BATTLEFIELD<br />
Room Honore on the Lobby Level, Sun at 10:00 am<br />
Chair Marilyn Yaquinto, Truman State University<br />
yaquinto@truman.edu<br />
Paper Professionalization in E-Campaigning A Longitudinal Analysis<br />
from Germany<br />
In which way is e-campaigning affected by processes of political<br />
professionalization This paper addresses this question through a<br />
longitudinal structure and content analysis of German party Web<br />
sites in the 2002 and 2005 National Elections.<br />
Eva Johanna Schweitzer, University of Mainz<br />
eva.schweitzer@uni-mainz.de<br />
Paper The Use of Email by 1st and 2nd Tier Candidates in the <strong>2008</strong><br />
Primaries<br />
This paper examines the strategies that campaigns are adopting<br />
to make use of e-mail to contact potential supporters, focusing on<br />
differences between “first tier” and “second tier” candidates in each<br />
field.<br />
Joseph D. Giammo, University of Arkansas, Little Rock<br />
jdgiammo@ualr.edu<br />
Paper Web Campaigning by Presidential Candidates 2007-<strong>2008</strong><br />
This paper examines the election campaign websites of candidates<br />
running for President of the United States in both the Democratic<br />
and Republican parties in 2007.<br />
Joe Gaziano, Lewis University<br />
gazianoj@lewisu.edu<br />
Laurette Liesen, Lewis University<br />
liesenla@lewisu.edu<br />
Paper<br />
Paper<br />
Disc.<br />
Prospects for Prospective Voting: The Policy Content of<br />
Campaign Websites<br />
This study evaluates if campaign websites can provide voters with<br />
substantive information about the policy positions of candidates. We<br />
develop an informativeness index and examine how it varies across<br />
candidates and factors that influence it.<br />
Milena I. Neshkova, Indiana University<br />
mneshkov@indiana.edu<br />
Brendan Carroll, Indiana University<br />
bjcarrol@indiana.edu<br />
The Virtual Campaign: How Presidential Candidates Employ<br />
Electronic Mail<br />
This paper analyzes presidential campaigns' electronic mail during<br />
the 2004 and <strong>2008</strong> nomination cycles. It examines e-mail both for<br />
content and for "interactivity," i.e. the quantity of weblinks the e-<br />
mail provides.<br />
Dante J. Scala, University of New Hampshire<br />
dante.scala@unh.edu<br />
Brian K. Arbour, John Jay College, CUNY<br />
barbour@jjay.cuny.edu<br />
24-8 EFFECTS OF ELECTORAL RULES ON<br />
PARTICIPATION<br />
Room Suite 9-150 on the 9th Floor, Sun at 10:00 am<br />
Chair David Brockington, University of Plymouth<br />
david.brockington@plymouth.ac.uk<br />
Paper America's Dynamic Population and the Future of Congressional<br />
Representation<br />
This paper examines how immigration and population change in the<br />
U.S. wil affect representation in the U.S. Congress.<br />
Jane Junn, Rutgers University<br />
junn@rci.rutgers.edu<br />
Marika Dunn, Rutgers University<br />
mdunn@eden.rutgers.edu<br />
Paper Doubly Bound Revisited: The Participatory Effects of<br />
Descriptive Representation<br />
This paper breaks new ground by exploring whether descriptive<br />
representatives stimulate greater political participation among<br />
constituents, and in particular by comparing such effects across and<br />
between race and gender.<br />
Porsha Cropper, Harvard University<br />
pcropper@fas.harvard.edu<br />
Shauna L. Shames, Harvard University<br />
shames@fas.harvard.edu<br />
Paper The Effects of Registration Deadlines and Election Day<br />
Registration<br />
This paper considers the impact of deadlines and Election Day<br />
registration on county-level turnout and registration rates.<br />
Greg Vonnahme, Rice University<br />
gvonnahm@rice.edu<br />
Paper Changing the Rules: Institutional Change and Voter Turnout<br />
The paper develops a theory of the dynamic effects of institutional<br />
change on information levels and turnout. We test the theory with<br />
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems data from 50 elections in<br />
more than 30 countries using multilevel techniques.<br />
Gregory Love, University of California, Davis<br />
gjlove@ucdavis.edu<br />
Ryan E. Carlin, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill<br />
rcarlin@email.unc.edu<br />
Disc. David Brockington, University of Plymouth<br />
david.brockington@plymouth.ac.uk<br />
340