2008 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2008 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2008 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Saturday, April 5-10:00 am<br />
Paper<br />
Disc.<br />
Eros is <strong>Political</strong>: Alcibiades and Aristophanes' Roles in the<br />
Symposium<br />
This paper examines Alcibiades' and Aristophanes' roles in linking<br />
the erotic with the political. Both aim to harmonize political<br />
ambition with erotic striving but end up demonstrating the<br />
tyrannical aspects of eros, though in different ways.<br />
Eric Hoyer, University of Pennsylvania<br />
ehoyer@sas.upenn.edu<br />
Shalini Satkunanandan, University of Chicago<br />
shalinis@uchicago.edu<br />
31-12 THE PRINCIPLES OF POLITICS<br />
Room Salon 7 on the 3rd Floor, Sat at 10:00 am<br />
Chair Ross J. Corbett, Northern Illinois University<br />
rcorbett@niu.edu<br />
Paper Sociological and Moral Reasoning in the <strong>Political</strong> Thought of<br />
Montesquieu<br />
Divergent prescriptions that may follow from the normative aspect<br />
of Montesquieu’s sociological analysis concerned with social<br />
preservation, and intrinsic ethical reasoning concerned with moral<br />
goodness, can be reconciled by the principle of moderation.<br />
Peter M. Levine, National-Louis University<br />
plevine@nl.edu<br />
Paper American Values and the Constitution: Assessing the Impact of<br />
the Declaration of Independence on the Formation of American<br />
<strong>Political</strong> Institutions<br />
This paper assesses the impact of the values articulated in<br />
the Declaration of Independence on the interpretation of the<br />
Constitution, as discussed by various influential American thinkers.<br />
Brent Stewart Lerseth, Augustana College<br />
blerseth@hotmail.com<br />
Paper Can Moral Sense Alone Identify Moral Truth<br />
Through the works of Francis Hutcheson, David Hume, and Adam<br />
Smith, this paper will examine whether moral sense or sentiment<br />
alone can be the source of moral truth.<br />
Noriaki Iwasa, Georgetown University<br />
niwasa@gmail.com<br />
Disc. Peter McNamara, Utah State University<br />
peter.mcnamara@usu.edu<br />
32-11 TOCQUEVILLE ON FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY<br />
Room Crystal on the 3rd Floor, Sat at 10:00 am<br />
Chair Will Geisler, University of Dallas<br />
andros47@gmail.com<br />
Paper Sour Grapes and Complete Equality: A Sartrean Interpretation<br />
of Tocqueville's Americans<br />
In this essay, I will defend Tocqueville against the charge that his<br />
psychology is inconsistent and incoherent through Jean-Paul Sartre's<br />
little known theory of the emotions.<br />
Michael Locke McLendon, California State University, Los<br />
Angeles<br />
mmclend2@calstatela.edu<br />
Paper Tocqueville on Politics and Freedom in Democratic Society<br />
Following Tocqueville, I argue that democratic political freedom<br />
is devalued relative to the expansive freedom of “democratic<br />
openness.” Today’s triumph of democratic principles and absence of<br />
democratic political practice is thus no coincidence.<br />
Steven Bilakovics, University of Texas, Austin<br />
stevebilak@hotmail.com<br />
Paper Lincoln and Tocqueville on Democratic Ambition<br />
Compares Lincoln's Lyceum speech and Tocqueville's Democracy<br />
in America on political ambition in liberal democracy. Contrasts<br />
Lincoln's concern about anti-democratic super-ambition with<br />
Tocqueville's fear of a politically apathetic citizenry.<br />
Aaron Louis Herold, University of Texas, Austin<br />
alherold@mail.utexas.edu<br />
Paper<br />
Disc.<br />
Liberty's Limits: Dewey's Common Faith and Tocqueville's<br />
Democracy in America<br />
This paper explores the nature of the bounds to freedom that<br />
Tocqueville presents as necessary limits in the transition to the<br />
democratic age. I explore to what degree these are compatible with<br />
Dewey's value and norm habituation mechanisms.<br />
Conor Paulus Williams, Georgetown University<br />
cpw6@georgetown.edu<br />
Jeffrey David Hilmer, Merrimack College<br />
hilmerj@merrimack.edu<br />
William F. Byrne, St. John's University<br />
byrnew@stjohns.edu<br />
32-15 FUNCTIONS OF POLITICS: RATIONALITY,<br />
EMOTION, AND CONFLICT<br />
Room Salon 8 on the 3rd Floor, Sat at 10:00 am<br />
Chair Peter Stone, Stanford University<br />
peter.stone@stanford.edu<br />
Paper Democracy as a Condition of Individual Rationality and<br />
<strong>Political</strong> Obligation<br />
Democracy provides the optimal conditions for individuals to form<br />
warranted views about the norms of public life. The paper explores<br />
how the connection between individual and collective rationality<br />
might establish an obligation to support democracy.<br />
Alexander Moon, Ithaca College<br />
amoon@ithaca.edu<br />
Paper Forgiveness, Promise and Antagonistic Democracy<br />
This paper aims at explicating the indispensability of forgiveness<br />
and promise in the antagonistic version of democracy in which<br />
public debates and struggles inevitably generate tensions and<br />
hostilities.<br />
Man Kwon Kim, New School for Social Research<br />
KimM712@newschool.edu<br />
Paper Taming Compassion: Reason or Ritual<br />
Although liberal democrats preclude pity and compassion in<br />
activating democracy due to the pathologies of pity," democracy<br />
can be better enhanced when pity and compassion is balanced with<br />
ritual, not by rationally transforming it.<br />
Sungmoon Kim, University of Maryland, College Park<br />
smkim@gvpt.umd.edu<br />
Paper The Functions of Politics<br />
I argue that politics has two chief functions. First, to make the<br />
general arrangements of a group's affairs responsive to the wants<br />
and fears of its current members. Second, to allow groups to make a<br />
significant mark on the world and society.<br />
T. J. Donahue, Johns Hopkins University<br />
tdonahu3@jhu.edu<br />
Disc. Peter Stone, Stanford University<br />
peter.stone@stanford.edu<br />
Jason Damian Hill, De Paul University<br />
jhill6@depaul.edu<br />
33-10 CONSERVATISM TODAY<br />
Room Wabash on the 3rd Floor, Sat at 10:00 am<br />
Chair Steven Gerencser, Indiana University, South Bend<br />
sgerencs@iusb.edu<br />
Paper Catholic Conservative and American Patriot: The Anti-<br />
Individualist Vision of Garry Wills<br />
This paper analyzes the political thought of Garry Wills. It examines<br />
his moral concepts, assumptiopns about guilt and memory, and<br />
incremental understanding of historical change. It then discussess<br />
his defense of protest and critique of capitalism.<br />
Cyrus Zirakzadeh, University of Connecticut<br />
Cyrus.Zirakzadeh@uconn.edu<br />
263