2008 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2008 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
2008 Conference Program - Midwest Political Science Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Thursday, April 3-12:45 pm<br />
17-25 GENDER AND CONFLICT (Co-sponsored with Gender<br />
and Politics, see 28-24)<br />
Room Suite 9-150 on the 9th Floor, Thur at 12:45 pm<br />
Chair Monika Nalepa, Rice University<br />
nalepa@rice.edu<br />
Paper Redressing War Rape in Bosnia: The Challenge for ICTY<br />
The paper examines rape as a deliberate assault strategy<br />
implemented by the Serb troops against the Bosnian Muslims in<br />
the war of 1992 – 1995 and looks at the challenges it poses for the<br />
International Crime Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.<br />
Elena Pokalova, Kent State University<br />
epokalo1@kent.edu<br />
Paper Conflict Negotiators: Gender as a Variable in El Salvador and<br />
Guatemala<br />
As part of a larger project on women conflict negotiators in Central<br />
America, this paper examines the specifics of gender as a variable in<br />
the El Salvador negotiations.<br />
Sarah Taylor, New School for Social Research<br />
taylor.sarah@gmail.com<br />
Paper Gender and Restorative Justice in Northern Ireland<br />
The paper draws on empirical research to explore the gender-power<br />
dynamics of informal restorative justice practices in Northern<br />
Ireland.<br />
Fidelma Ashe, University of Ulster<br />
f.ashe@ulster.ac.uk<br />
Paper Gender and the Design of Transitional Justice in Post-Conflict<br />
Societies<br />
This paper utilizes fuzzy-set analysis to evaluate how gender biases,<br />
including gendered understandings of war and political violence,<br />
have impacted the design and implementation of transitional justice<br />
processes in nations emerging from civil war.<br />
Amber A. Ussery, University of Arizona<br />
aussery@u.arizona.edu<br />
Disc. Monika Nalepa, Rice University<br />
nalepa@rice.edu<br />
19-3 INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN<br />
Room Suite 10-250 on the 10th Floor, Thur at 12:45 pm<br />
Chair Douglas M. Stinnett, University of Georgia<br />
stinnett@uga.edu<br />
Paper Explaining Participation in the Proliferation Security Initiative<br />
This paper tests whether the Proliferation Security Initiative is best<br />
explained as a screening mechanism to identify states with likeminded<br />
security concerns or as a vehicle for pressuring states into<br />
adopting the norms of its founders.<br />
Bryan R. Early, University of Georgia<br />
b.early1@gmail.com<br />
Cale D. Horne, University of Georgia<br />
cdhorne@uga.edu<br />
Paper The Design of River Treaties<br />
This study investigates the factors that lead to different levels<br />
of institutionalism in river treaties. Factors such as the issue to<br />
be resolved are shown to be more important determinates of<br />
centralization of control than are national factors.<br />
Jeffrey B. Stout, University of Iowa<br />
jeffrey-stout@uiowa.edu<br />
Paper Major Powers and Institutional Design in International<br />
Environmental Agreements<br />
The paper explores the impact of major power states on the<br />
institutional design of international environmental treaties with<br />
emphasis on the tension between bilateral and multilateral<br />
approaches.<br />
Andrew G. Long, Kansas State University<br />
aglong@ksu.edu<br />
Renato Corbetta, University of Alabama, Birimingham<br />
corbetta@uab.edu<br />
Paper<br />
Disc.<br />
Global Players and Efficient Institutional Designs: Compliance<br />
to International Environmental Agreements in China<br />
This paper provides an in-depth analysis of global players such<br />
as China in trade integration and environmental protection and<br />
evaluates the impacts of various models of institutional designs in<br />
the development of global public policies.<br />
Sarah Helen McLaughlin, London School of Economics<br />
s.h.mclaughlin@lse.ac.uk<br />
Douglas M. Stinnett, University of Georgia<br />
stinnett@uga.edu<br />
20-3 ETHNICITY IN ELECTORAL POLITICS<br />
Room Salon 5 on the 3rd Floor, Thur at 12:45 pm<br />
Chair Todd Alan Eisenstadt, American University<br />
eisensta@american.edu<br />
Paper Politics of Dealignment in Bolivia<br />
Politics of dealignment in Latin America erode traditional bases of<br />
support providing avenues for informal institutionalization of ethnic<br />
parties. These institutions are shaped by demands of autonomy,<br />
broader participation and fair citizenship.<br />
Gabriela Hoberman, Florida International University<br />
ghobe001@fiu.edu<br />
Paper Is an Ethnic Party, an Ethnic Party A Reconceptualization and<br />
Their Effect<br />
This paper seeks to reconceptualize ethnic parties and to investigate<br />
how internal features of such parties interact with external<br />
incentives to affect their behavior in European states.<br />
John Ishiyama, Truman State University<br />
jishiyam@truman.edu<br />
Jeff William Justice, Truman State University<br />
jjustice@truman.edu<br />
Marijke Breuning, Truman State University<br />
mbreunin@truman.edu<br />
Paper Nationalism, Violence, and Voting: Explaining Variation in<br />
Support for Paramilitary Parties at the Ballot Box<br />
This paper looks at variation in the extent to which individuals vote<br />
for political parties associated with the use of ethno-nationalist<br />
violence against the state and/or the opposing community (sectarian<br />
violence).<br />
Mary Beth Ehrhardt, Princeton University<br />
mehrhard@princeton.edu<br />
Paper Why Sunni Votes are Cheap in Lebanon but Dear in Yemen<br />
I use original survey data collected in Lebanon and Yemen to<br />
examine the effect of intrasectarian elite competition for constituent<br />
votes, or the lack thereof, on patron-client relationships.<br />
Daniel Corstange, University of Michigan<br />
dancorst@umich.edu<br />
Disc. Todd Alan Eisenstadt, American University<br />
eisensta@american.edu<br />
21-301 POSTER SESSION: POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY<br />
Room Grand on the 4th Floor, Thur at 12:45 pm<br />
Poster 4 Delegates or Trustees: What do Citizens Want to Drive<br />
Representatives<br />
Citizens are conflicted about how they would like to be represented.<br />
Using an experimental design I examine how people respond to<br />
a representative who either opts to respond to the wishes of his<br />
constituents or to the wishes of the broader public.<br />
David Doherty, University of Colorado, Boulder<br />
dohertyd@colorado.edu<br />
110