02.02.2015 Views

SumerianGrammar

SumerianGrammar

SumerianGrammar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

92 CHAPTER TWELVE<br />

12.8. DIMENSIONAL INDICATORS<br />

The Sumerian verb is characterized by a series of up to six prefixed<br />

particles. Their main and original—but no longer exclusive—function<br />

is to indicate arrest and movement, direction, separation, company<br />

and related notions.<br />

These indicators frequently correspond to case particles 4–9 (see<br />

5.4.2.4–9) to suffixed nouns in the same phrase. The dimensional indicators<br />

are arranged in a string within which the individual elements<br />

have their fixed and inalterable rank.<br />

Many dimensional indicators can be segmentized into a pronominal<br />

head and a case element, e.g., [na] “for, to him/her”, consisting<br />

of 3 rd sg. person-class [n] and the (dative-)locative element [a],<br />

or -(e)ne-da [(e)ne-da] “with them”, where pl. [(e)ne] is combined<br />

with comitative [da].<br />

Note to -da-: Due to the uncertainties of Sumerian spelling, esp.<br />

with regard to the frequent non-notation of syllable-closing consonants,<br />

we sometimes cannot know whether -da- was meant for [nda],<br />

[bda], [mda], or [da] alone, and similarly for -“i-, -ta-, etc.<br />

See 12.8.3 for the question whether dimensional indicators could<br />

also occur without reference to a person.<br />

For each dimensional indicator there exists a variant with prefixed<br />

[m(u)], e.g., -na- : (-)mu-na-; (-)ba- : (-)V-m-ma-. Following the grammatical<br />

terminology of Akkadian, Foxvog 1974 and 1975, 400 f. with<br />

fn. 17, proposed “Sumerian ventive” for the m-forms; see Attinger<br />

1993, 270–80 with lit. p. 270.<br />

If one wonders about the coincidence of both languages using an<br />

[m] element for ventive, it should be borne in mind that the Akkadian<br />

ventive marker is (historically) [aC] (before -k, -n, -“ ), and it is only<br />

[am] before -m or in word-final position. There is no need, in<br />

Akkadian, to construe ad hoc assimilation rules like “am-kum” > akkum<br />

etc. Rather, the ventive (as opposed to affirmative) function of Akkadian<br />

[aC/am] may have been a re-interpretation of this morpheme under<br />

Sumerian influence, at the beginning of the Sumero-Akkadian areal<br />

interaction. See Pedersén 1989, 434 for derivation of the Akkadian<br />

ventive from common-Semitic affirmative (energetic) [an].<br />

Note: The [m] of the Akkadian dative pronouns -kum, -“um, -nim, etc., has, most<br />

probably, to be kept separate from the [m] of the ventive final form -am.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!