SumerianGrammar
SumerianGrammar
SumerianGrammar
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
92 CHAPTER TWELVE<br />
12.8. DIMENSIONAL INDICATORS<br />
The Sumerian verb is characterized by a series of up to six prefixed<br />
particles. Their main and original—but no longer exclusive—function<br />
is to indicate arrest and movement, direction, separation, company<br />
and related notions.<br />
These indicators frequently correspond to case particles 4–9 (see<br />
5.4.2.4–9) to suffixed nouns in the same phrase. The dimensional indicators<br />
are arranged in a string within which the individual elements<br />
have their fixed and inalterable rank.<br />
Many dimensional indicators can be segmentized into a pronominal<br />
head and a case element, e.g., [na] “for, to him/her”, consisting<br />
of 3 rd sg. person-class [n] and the (dative-)locative element [a],<br />
or -(e)ne-da [(e)ne-da] “with them”, where pl. [(e)ne] is combined<br />
with comitative [da].<br />
Note to -da-: Due to the uncertainties of Sumerian spelling, esp.<br />
with regard to the frequent non-notation of syllable-closing consonants,<br />
we sometimes cannot know whether -da- was meant for [nda],<br />
[bda], [mda], or [da] alone, and similarly for -“i-, -ta-, etc.<br />
See 12.8.3 for the question whether dimensional indicators could<br />
also occur without reference to a person.<br />
For each dimensional indicator there exists a variant with prefixed<br />
[m(u)], e.g., -na- : (-)mu-na-; (-)ba- : (-)V-m-ma-. Following the grammatical<br />
terminology of Akkadian, Foxvog 1974 and 1975, 400 f. with<br />
fn. 17, proposed “Sumerian ventive” for the m-forms; see Attinger<br />
1993, 270–80 with lit. p. 270.<br />
If one wonders about the coincidence of both languages using an<br />
[m] element for ventive, it should be borne in mind that the Akkadian<br />
ventive marker is (historically) [aC] (before -k, -n, -“ ), and it is only<br />
[am] before -m or in word-final position. There is no need, in<br />
Akkadian, to construe ad hoc assimilation rules like “am-kum” > akkum<br />
etc. Rather, the ventive (as opposed to affirmative) function of Akkadian<br />
[aC/am] may have been a re-interpretation of this morpheme under<br />
Sumerian influence, at the beginning of the Sumero-Akkadian areal<br />
interaction. See Pedersén 1989, 434 for derivation of the Akkadian<br />
ventive from common-Semitic affirmative (energetic) [an].<br />
Note: The [m] of the Akkadian dative pronouns -kum, -“um, -nim, etc., has, most<br />
probably, to be kept separate from the [m] of the ventive final form -am.