SumerianGrammar
SumerianGrammar
SumerianGrammar
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
72 CHAPTER TWELVE<br />
sg.<br />
pl.<br />
¢.<br />
m.<br />
For details on the categories ¢am†u and marû see 12.2.<br />
The surrounding (i.e., prefixed and suffixed) verbal particles present<br />
an enormous variety, and they may be classified, in diminishing<br />
distance, or rank, from the base:<br />
a) the particle [ed], suffixed, compatible only with the marû base.<br />
b) ergative and absolutive markers, both prefixed and suffixed.<br />
c) prefixed markers of dimensional reference, ranked in the sequence<br />
(from right to left) locative 2, directive, terminative, ablative(-instrumental),<br />
comitative, dative, locative. These partly have person or<br />
non-person reference. The first-to-the-left of these, moreover, may<br />
imply motion or absence of motion.<br />
d) prefixed markers of connection, negation, and of diverse positive<br />
or negative modalities.<br />
e) and f ) nominalizer [a] and copula [am], both suffixed.<br />
Whereas the variation of the string of suffixed particles is limited, the<br />
“prefix string” offers an astounding number of variants, since up to<br />
5 particles may appear in a row, e.g., enim hu-mu-na-ni-ib-ge 4 -ge 4<br />
[hu-mu-na-ni-b-gege] “the word—verily—ventive—dative (to him/<br />
her)—directive/causative—absolutive (it)—make return (marû base)—<br />
(ergative: he/she)” = “he/she verily answers him/her thereupon”.<br />
Heimpel, in his 1974 count of OB “prefix chain” variants, added<br />
up to 1264; this figure may now easily be raised to about 1300–1400.<br />
For the pre-Ur III period Heimpel offered 122, for the Gudea corpus<br />
154 “prefix chains”.<br />
Note: For the sake of comparison, compare the “prefix chains” in modern Basque<br />
(Guipuzcoan), a language structurally comparable to Sumerian: 537 Variants are<br />
listed in J. L. Mendizabal, La lengua vasca, 2 1959 [Buenos Aires] 353–69.<br />
Let it be borne in mind, however, that in modern French, if we<br />
arrange all possible combinations of bound elements je with me, te,<br />
le, la, nous, vous, les, lui, leur, en, y, each in the positive and negative,<br />
e.g., je te le dis etc., we arrive at about 80 forms. In fact, jene-lui-en-ai-rien-dit<br />
“I did not tell him/her anything about it” is as<br />
complex a verbal form as many in Sumerian.