02.02.2015 Views

SumerianGrammar

SumerianGrammar

SumerianGrammar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

136 CHAPTER TWELVE<br />

B-[ede] and following verb does not—as a rule—occur with B-[eda]<br />

for which see 12.14.3.2.<br />

Edzard 1967, 43; but see the reservations made by Attinger 1993, 307.<br />

12.14.3.2. B-[eda]<br />

As with B-[ede], B is always represented by the marû base of the verb.<br />

In analogy to B-[ede], therefore, a morphological analysis B-ed-a is<br />

obvious. B-[eda] would, formally, constitute a marû participle B-[ed]<br />

with the addition of the locative particle [a].<br />

é-a-ni §rú-da ma-an-du 11 “(Ningirsu) told me (to build =) I should<br />

build his house” Gudea Cyl. A iv 20.<br />

gidri-u ∞ 4 -sù-§ rá “u ∞gá-∞gá-da ... d Ig-alim ...en d Nin-∞gír-su-ra me-nida<br />

mu-na-da-dib-e “(Gudea) brings Ig-alim along with himself (and<br />

introduces him) to the lord Ningirsu . . ., that he (Ig-alim) hand over<br />

a sceptre for long days” Gudea Cyl. B vi 16–23.<br />

Note: Many parallel examples for B-[eda] in Gudea Cyl. B vi 11–x 17. They<br />

were listed in Edzard 1972, 25–27; see Edzard 1997, 92–94, for a recent translation.<br />

In all the examples (numbering 25) the subject implied in B-[eda] and the<br />

subject of the following verb are different, so that B-[eda] is clearly set off against<br />

B-[ede] (see 12.14.3.1).<br />

Edzard 1967, 43; Thomsen 1984, 266. However, as with B-[ede], note Attinger’s<br />

reservations (1993, 307).<br />

In OB Sumerian literary texts, different manuscripts are occasionally<br />

inconsistent in their use of B-[ede], B-[eda], or even B-[edam],<br />

so that the awareness of the distinction of the respective forms may<br />

have been lost.<br />

12.14.3.3. B-[ada]<br />

Although B-[ada] occurs in contexts where it is clearly syntactically<br />

paralleled with B-[eda] [B-ed-a], it cannot be analysed as *B-ad-a<br />

because we know of no morpheme *[ad].<br />

B in B-[ada] is always represented by the ¢am†u base of the verb.<br />

B-[ada] forms are always intransitive or passive and never have an<br />

ergative subject.<br />

Since we explain B-[ede] and B-[eda] as marû participle constructions,<br />

it would only be logical to define B-[ada] as the ¢am†u<br />

participle with the addition of a case particle. Here, then, comitative<br />

[da] offers itself. Krecher 1978, 401 f. fn. 21, opened the way<br />

to this explanation.<br />

Note: The analysis of B-[ada] as B-a-da may challenge our analysis of B-[eda]<br />

as [B-ed-a] (12.14.3.2), with locative [a], and lead to propose *[B-ed-da] instead

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!