02.02.2015 Views

SumerianGrammar

SumerianGrammar

SumerianGrammar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58 CHAPTER NINE<br />

*n : b) is surprising, at least if one expects a morphological correspondence<br />

between interrogative and personal pronouns as, e.g., in<br />

Latin quis : is, quid : id or German wer : er, was : das.<br />

For a-ba, ergative a-ba-a is attested, and both a-ba and a-na, like<br />

rd<br />

3 person class pronoun e-ne, may be combined with the copula<br />

-àm. Generally speaking, the restrictions as to the affixation of case<br />

particles affecting the personal pronouns apply equally to the interrogative<br />

pronouns (see 9.1).<br />

There is no adjectival interrogative, as a possible correspondence<br />

to Akkadian ajjû, ajjìtu “which”. For na-me “any one” see 9.5.2.<br />

Note: CAD A/1, 234 ajû lex., quotes a late reference where na-me is rendered<br />

by ajjû “which”; here, however, the Sumerian text has the well-known syntagma<br />

na-me + negated verb, perhaps as a question, so that the Akkadian translation<br />

“which one” would actually render “(has) no one”.<br />

9.5. ALLEGED PRONOUNS<br />

9.5.1. Reflexive pronoun<br />

The Sumerian base ní-(te-) serves to express, along with possessive<br />

particles, notions which we are used to translate by “myself ”, etc.<br />

i.e., by a reflexive pronoun: “ám-ní-te-na “purchase price of himself<br />

” (= for his own person) NG no. 38:7; ní-zu-“è ∞gé“tu-zu “to yourself<br />

your ear!” (= “be aware of yourself ”) Angim 81, and see more<br />

examples in Thomsen 1984, 78 f.<br />

There seems to have been a general distribution rule: ní-te-V versus<br />

ní-C, i.e., ní-∞gu 10 /-zu versus ní-te(-a)-ni, ní-te(-a)-ne-ne for<br />

“my/your/itself ”, “him/herself, themselves”. But note ní-te-∞gu 10 -“è<br />

“to myself ” UET 6/2, 144:36 f., quoted by Attinger 1993, 174.<br />

NS or OB ní-te is preceded by OS ME-te, most probably to be<br />

read ni x -te (Attinger 1993, 174): Nite(TE:ME)-ga-i “Let me praise<br />

(my)self ” DP 73 ii 2 (PN).<br />

For bilingual contexts where ní-te = ramanu see CAD R 117 lex.<br />

ní-(te-) + possessive particle is a nominal phrase not different from,<br />

e.g., sa∞g + poss. particle, and therefore, strictly speaking, ní-(te-) cannot<br />

be considered a “pronoun”. One would rather associate ní-(te)<br />

with parts of the body.<br />

Alster 1974, 178–80; Cavigneaux 1978, 177–85; Thomsen 1984, 78 f.; Attinger<br />

1993, 174 f. with more lit.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!