SumerianGrammar
SumerianGrammar
SumerianGrammar
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
58 CHAPTER NINE<br />
*n : b) is surprising, at least if one expects a morphological correspondence<br />
between interrogative and personal pronouns as, e.g., in<br />
Latin quis : is, quid : id or German wer : er, was : das.<br />
For a-ba, ergative a-ba-a is attested, and both a-ba and a-na, like<br />
rd<br />
3 person class pronoun e-ne, may be combined with the copula<br />
-àm. Generally speaking, the restrictions as to the affixation of case<br />
particles affecting the personal pronouns apply equally to the interrogative<br />
pronouns (see 9.1).<br />
There is no adjectival interrogative, as a possible correspondence<br />
to Akkadian ajjû, ajjìtu “which”. For na-me “any one” see 9.5.2.<br />
Note: CAD A/1, 234 ajû lex., quotes a late reference where na-me is rendered<br />
by ajjû “which”; here, however, the Sumerian text has the well-known syntagma<br />
na-me + negated verb, perhaps as a question, so that the Akkadian translation<br />
“which one” would actually render “(has) no one”.<br />
9.5. ALLEGED PRONOUNS<br />
9.5.1. Reflexive pronoun<br />
The Sumerian base ní-(te-) serves to express, along with possessive<br />
particles, notions which we are used to translate by “myself ”, etc.<br />
i.e., by a reflexive pronoun: “ám-ní-te-na “purchase price of himself<br />
” (= for his own person) NG no. 38:7; ní-zu-“è ∞gé“tu-zu “to yourself<br />
your ear!” (= “be aware of yourself ”) Angim 81, and see more<br />
examples in Thomsen 1984, 78 f.<br />
There seems to have been a general distribution rule: ní-te-V versus<br />
ní-C, i.e., ní-∞gu 10 /-zu versus ní-te(-a)-ni, ní-te(-a)-ne-ne for<br />
“my/your/itself ”, “him/herself, themselves”. But note ní-te-∞gu 10 -“è<br />
“to myself ” UET 6/2, 144:36 f., quoted by Attinger 1993, 174.<br />
NS or OB ní-te is preceded by OS ME-te, most probably to be<br />
read ni x -te (Attinger 1993, 174): Nite(TE:ME)-ga-i “Let me praise<br />
(my)self ” DP 73 ii 2 (PN).<br />
For bilingual contexts where ní-te = ramanu see CAD R 117 lex.<br />
ní-(te-) + possessive particle is a nominal phrase not different from,<br />
e.g., sa∞g + poss. particle, and therefore, strictly speaking, ní-(te-) cannot<br />
be considered a “pronoun”. One would rather associate ní-(te)<br />
with parts of the body.<br />
Alster 1974, 178–80; Cavigneaux 1978, 177–85; Thomsen 1984, 78 f.; Attinger<br />
1993, 174 f. with more lit.