SumerianGrammar
SumerianGrammar
SumerianGrammar
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4 CHAPTER ONE<br />
It cannot be excluded that, within Mesopotamia proper, Sumerian<br />
had neighbours who spoke a language—or languages—that were,<br />
step by step, superseded by Sumerian, but which left their traces in<br />
Sumerian proper names (gods, places) and vocabulary. Thus, e.g.,<br />
divine names such as Nan“e or ΩGatumdu, goddesses at home in the<br />
ΩGirsu/Laga“ region, may belong to a substratum, or adstratum,<br />
because these names defy all efforts to explain them by way of<br />
Sumerian etymology. Our judgement in this matter is, however,<br />
highly subjective because we know nothing of the early history of<br />
Sumerian and its sound structure. In fact, our first tentative identification<br />
of Sumerian “sound” hardly goes farther back than 24th<br />
century B.C., and the publication of the Ebla glosses for Sumerian<br />
lexical items brought more than one surprise.<br />
For some time, a “monosyllabic myth” has been popular among<br />
Sumerologists, relegating words of more than one syllable to a “Proto-<br />
Euphratian” substratum.<br />
Cf., e.g., B. Landsberger 1944, apud A. Salonen 1968, 31.<br />
See, however, the very sobering discussion of G. Rubio 1999, 1–16,<br />
“On the alleged ‘pre-Sumerian’ substratum” where the author arrives<br />
at the conclusion (p. 11), “Thus, there is no monolithic substratum<br />
that would have left, in a sort of primeval age, its vestiges in Sumerian<br />
lexicon. All one can detect is a complex and fuzzy web of borrowings<br />
whose directions are frequently difficult to determine”.<br />
Nan“e and ªGatumdu (and others) may be pre-Sumerian names,<br />
as may many place names. But we have no means at our disposal<br />
to prove such a supposition. It is a well known fact that proper<br />
names are specially prone to changes of all kind (slurring, abbreviation,<br />
deformation by analogy, popular etymology).<br />
Hurrians—with a language of their own—first appear in cuneiform<br />
sources toward the end of the third millennium B.C. They most<br />
probably never were immediate neighbours of the Sumerians, and<br />
so direct language contact can be excluded, at least during the centuries<br />
before the Third Dynasty of Ur.<br />
In general, it may be said that the Mesopotamian plain was not<br />
conducive to a great variety of languages, as against Iran, Anatolia<br />
or the Caucasus which, until our days, has been a veritable language<br />
museum.<br />
As a consequence of early close contacts between Sumerians and<br />
Semites, a situation arose which greatly stimulated mutual influences.<br />
Sumerian was heading for a Sumero-Akkadian “linguistic area”—