SumerianGrammar
SumerianGrammar
SumerianGrammar
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER EIGHTEEN<br />
SUMMARY—AND WHAT IS STILL MISSING<br />
The present grammar, in its essential aspects, is traditionally descriptive.<br />
It is not under the obligation of a more recent method—generative,<br />
structural, or transformational. It is far from perfect as, e.g.,<br />
in contrast to A. Falkenstein’s monumental “Gudea” grammar (1949,<br />
1950), it lacks a section—or chapters—on syntax, the stepchild of<br />
more recent grammars. However, quite a few features that would<br />
traditionally figure in a “syntax” (the description of how parts of<br />
speech as well as phrases are “set together”, but also of the way by<br />
which parts of speech and phrases are morphologically marked for<br />
their functions), have been included in the above chapters: e.g., functions<br />
and morpho-syntactical behaviour of the case particles (5.4),<br />
the system of the modal and connecting indicators (12.11, 12.12),<br />
the vast complex of the non-finite verbal forms (12.14), or the nominalisation<br />
of finite verbal forms (12.16).<br />
On the other hand, the author may much too often have left the<br />
impression of Sumerian as one uniform block instead of a living<br />
being with a marked diachronic evolution. At any rate, a historical<br />
grammar of Sumerian still has to be written.<br />
Thirdly, the author has endeavoured, as often as possible, not to<br />
describe Sumerian as a completely isolated body, but in connection<br />
with Akkadian, the language of those inhabitants of Mesopotamia<br />
who were the immediate neighbours of the Sumerians for a whole<br />
millennium or even longer.<br />
The author will not enumerate here topics that would have merited<br />
inclusion in a grammar of Sumerian, such as, e.g., word formation<br />
and nominal compounds, morphological variation (both<br />
nominal and verbal) in different manuscripts of a given line of a literary<br />
composition, or literary style in general. There is no end of<br />
addenda—and corrigenda.<br />
Finally, according to the witty remark of the late I. M. Diakonoff<br />
that there are as many kinds of Sumerian as there are authors of<br />
Sumerian grammars, I freely admit the highly subjective character<br />
of my own effort.