02.02.2015 Views

SumerianGrammar

SumerianGrammar

SumerianGrammar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SUBSTANTIVES<br />

43<br />

ing is still inadequate. In the ubiquitous dedicatory formula “for<br />

his/her life”, the spelling is consistently nam-ti-la-ni-”È and never<br />

*-ni-i“ oder *-ni-e“. Either there were two syllables [ni“e] or -ni-”È<br />

stood for one syllable [ni“].<br />

Falkenstein 1949, 113 f., referred to the spelling sa∞g-bi“(PE”) “to<br />

its head” Gudea Cyl. B ii 18 with contrasting sa∞g-bi-”È in Cyl. A<br />

iv 11, and see Falkenstein 1949, 30.<br />

The terminative is most obviously opposed to the ablative in such<br />

phrases as an-gal-ta ki-gal-“è (see 5.4.2.7) or Úrim ki -ta Nibru ki -“è<br />

“from Ur to Nippur”.<br />

Local use is, again, transferred to temporal: u 4 -ul-lí-a-“è “until<br />

(those days =) all future”.<br />

Moreover, the terminative may be used to indicate abstract ways<br />

of reasoning: cause, reason, purpose. Cf. mu-bi-“è “(to its name =)<br />

therefore”; a-na-a“(-àm) “for what is it” = “why”; ní∞g-ba-a“ “as (the<br />

purpose of ) a present”.<br />

The terminative, set after a nominalized verbal phrase (whether<br />

introduced by u 4 or not) serves to express what is a subordinate temporal<br />

clause in Akkadian (with adi ): “until ...”.<br />

Both the terminative and adverbiative particles have to be kept<br />

separate from the quotation particle [e“e] which the Gudea corpus<br />

equally spell -É” (in OB e-“e). Cf. below 13.1.<br />

5.4.2.9. Directive<br />

The directive (locative-terminative) case particle [e] was, most probably,<br />

identical in sound with the ergative [e] and because both particles<br />

share the same spelling and phonotactic behaviour, the origin<br />

of the ergative particle has been sought in the directive. See above<br />

5.4.2.2.<br />

Be that as it may, by the time we have some insight into the phonetic<br />

realities hidden behind Sumerian spelling habits, both cases<br />

have clearly established themselves as separate entities and, most<br />

tellingly, the concord of the two case particles with verbal prefix particles<br />

is also different. Cf. Gudea Cyl. A iv 4: kar-Ni∞gin ki -na-ke 4 (dir.)<br />

má (absol.) bí(-n)-ús “he (= Gudea, erg.) had the boat moor at the<br />

quay of N.”.<br />

The main function of the directive is to express movement arriving<br />

(into contact with) an object, or position adjacent to (in contact<br />

with) an object.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!