SumerianGrammar
SumerianGrammar
SumerianGrammar
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SUBSTANTIVES<br />
43<br />
ing is still inadequate. In the ubiquitous dedicatory formula “for<br />
his/her life”, the spelling is consistently nam-ti-la-ni-”È and never<br />
*-ni-i“ oder *-ni-e“. Either there were two syllables [ni“e] or -ni-”È<br />
stood for one syllable [ni“].<br />
Falkenstein 1949, 113 f., referred to the spelling sa∞g-bi“(PE”) “to<br />
its head” Gudea Cyl. B ii 18 with contrasting sa∞g-bi-”È in Cyl. A<br />
iv 11, and see Falkenstein 1949, 30.<br />
The terminative is most obviously opposed to the ablative in such<br />
phrases as an-gal-ta ki-gal-“è (see 5.4.2.7) or Úrim ki -ta Nibru ki -“è<br />
“from Ur to Nippur”.<br />
Local use is, again, transferred to temporal: u 4 -ul-lí-a-“è “until<br />
(those days =) all future”.<br />
Moreover, the terminative may be used to indicate abstract ways<br />
of reasoning: cause, reason, purpose. Cf. mu-bi-“è “(to its name =)<br />
therefore”; a-na-a“(-àm) “for what is it” = “why”; ní∞g-ba-a“ “as (the<br />
purpose of ) a present”.<br />
The terminative, set after a nominalized verbal phrase (whether<br />
introduced by u 4 or not) serves to express what is a subordinate temporal<br />
clause in Akkadian (with adi ): “until ...”.<br />
Both the terminative and adverbiative particles have to be kept<br />
separate from the quotation particle [e“e] which the Gudea corpus<br />
equally spell -É” (in OB e-“e). Cf. below 13.1.<br />
5.4.2.9. Directive<br />
The directive (locative-terminative) case particle [e] was, most probably,<br />
identical in sound with the ergative [e] and because both particles<br />
share the same spelling and phonotactic behaviour, the origin<br />
of the ergative particle has been sought in the directive. See above<br />
5.4.2.2.<br />
Be that as it may, by the time we have some insight into the phonetic<br />
realities hidden behind Sumerian spelling habits, both cases<br />
have clearly established themselves as separate entities and, most<br />
tellingly, the concord of the two case particles with verbal prefix particles<br />
is also different. Cf. Gudea Cyl. A iv 4: kar-Ni∞gin ki -na-ke 4 (dir.)<br />
má (absol.) bí(-n)-ús “he (= Gudea, erg.) had the boat moor at the<br />
quay of N.”.<br />
The main function of the directive is to express movement arriving<br />
(into contact with) an object, or position adjacent to (in contact<br />
with) an object.