Bulletin 3. The flora of the Raritan Formation, 1911 - State of New ...
Bulletin 3. The flora of the Raritan Formation, 1911 - State of New ...
Bulletin 3. The flora of the Raritan Formation, 1911 - State of New ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
RARITAN FORMATION--CORRELATION. 51<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> West. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Ward was <strong>the</strong> first to point out that <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Raritan</strong> was older than <strong>the</strong> Dakota Group, which is undoubtedly<br />
<strong>the</strong> case, and it has been customary in recent years to regard<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Raritan</strong> as roughly corresponding to <strong>the</strong> Gault <strong>of</strong> Eng'land<br />
and <strong>the</strong> Albian <strong>of</strong> continental Europe, <strong>The</strong> view here presented<br />
is that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Raritan</strong> <strong>flora</strong> is much more closely allied with <strong>the</strong><br />
Cenomanian <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> old world than it is with <strong>the</strong> Albian or<br />
Gault At <strong>the</strong> same time it is quite obviously older than <strong>the</strong><br />
Magothy <strong>flora</strong>, that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dakota Group and those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> South<br />
Atlantic Coastal Plain, 2 unless possibly <strong>the</strong> lower Tusealoosa, <strong>of</strong><br />
western Alabama, is equivalent to <strong>the</strong> upper <strong>Raritan</strong> in <strong>the</strong><br />
vicinity <strong>of</strong> South Amboy, so that if <strong>the</strong>se latter are to remain in<br />
<strong>the</strong> Cenomanian, <strong>the</strong>y are to be regarded as Upper Cenomanian,<br />
in which case <strong>the</strong> <strong>Raritan</strong> may be regarded as Lower Cenomanian.<br />
European geology fm'nishes a similar case in <strong>the</strong><br />
division <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cenomanian into <strong>the</strong> substages Rotomaglan and<br />
Caretonian, although probably <strong>the</strong> parallelism <strong>of</strong> substages cannot<br />
be carried across <strong>the</strong> ocean. European paleontology furnishes<br />
abundant and well characterized Cenomanian and Senonian<br />
<strong>flora</strong>s for comi_ariso.n, and by this standard <strong>the</strong> <strong>Raritan</strong>, as well<br />
as <strong>the</strong> somewhat younger Dakota and Magothy <strong>flora</strong>s, are dearly<br />
Cenomanian <strong>flora</strong>s• <strong>The</strong> Turonian stage <strong>of</strong> European geology,<br />
on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, has thus far yielded so meager a <strong>flora</strong> that.<br />
it is practically useless as a basis for comparison, and it may well<br />
be that <strong>the</strong> <strong>flora</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dakota Group, along with its sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />
and eastern representatives--<strong>the</strong> Woodbine, Tuscaloosa, Eutaw,<br />
Middendorf, Bladen and Magothy <strong>flora</strong>s, represent tI_e Turonian<br />
stage <strong>of</strong> Europe• Stratigraphically, <strong>the</strong>re is 11ocontrary evidence<br />
and more or less <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dakota sandstone would simply go with<br />
• <strong>the</strong> overlying Benton, which invertebrate paleontologists have<br />
long considered as representing <strong>the</strong> Turonian <strong>of</strong> Europe. If<br />
this view is adopted it seems probable that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Raritan</strong> is to be<br />
correlated with, a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> upper Cenomanian <strong>of</strong> Europe•<br />
<strong>The</strong> paleobotanieal evidence for lhe Cenomanian age <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Raritan</strong> formation is briefly as follows: Ou general grounds,<br />
Older Cretaceous deposits are known from North Carolina to Alabama,<br />
hut <strong>the</strong>se are, in-so-far as ktmwn, unfossiliferous,<br />
NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY