15.05.2015 Views

Christoph Haederli - Les thèses en ligne de l'INP - Institut National ...

Christoph Haederli - Les thèses en ligne de l'INP - Institut National ...

Christoph Haederli - Les thèses en ligne de l'INP - Institut National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

144 NP Control with Optimal Sequ<strong>en</strong>ce SVM<br />

- Double commutation SVM has by far the lowest THD<br />

- Single commutation SVM has the second lowest THD<br />

- Carrier based PWM has the highest THD<br />

For a giv<strong>en</strong> THD, the losses behave as follows:<br />

- SVM has significantly lower losses than carrier based PWM<br />

- Double commutation based SVM has lower losses than single commutation based<br />

SVM<br />

TABLE 60, VARIOUS MODULATION TYPES WITH 2000 HZ SWITCHING FREQUENCY, M = 0.8,<br />

COS(ϕ)=0.85, R LOAD = 2.4 Ω, L LOAD = 0.25mH<br />

Modulation<br />

f switch<br />

f switch<br />

Switching<br />

THD<br />

THD<br />

THD<br />

THD<br />

THD<br />

Comm<strong>en</strong>ts<br />

Type<br />

Output<br />

Internal<br />

Losses<br />

U12<br />

I1<br />

I2<br />

I3<br />

avg.<br />

SVM(00) 1990 2144 307% 17.5 6.4 6.5 6.5 6.5 Very low switching loss (3<br />

times the loss at 4 times<br />

f switch). THD cannot be<br />

compared as a differ<strong>en</strong>t<br />

load is used<br />

SVM(01) 1987 2121 408% 16.7 5.7 5.8 5.7 5.7 Mo<strong>de</strong>rate THD reduction<br />

but large loss increase<br />

SVM(10) 1990 2268 305% 17.5 6.8 6.6 6.7 6.7 Very similar to single<br />

commutation operation<br />

SVM(11) 1990 2573 407% 16.3 5.1 5.1 5.2 5.1 Significant THD reduction<br />

but large loss increase<br />

PWM(0) 1990 2087 421% 17.3 6.5 6.3 6.3 6.4 Mo<strong>de</strong>rate THD with very<br />

high loss<br />

PWM(1) 2023 2284 324% 21.0 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 Reduced losses but<br />

significant increase of THD<br />

It can be conclu<strong>de</strong>d that optimal sequ<strong>en</strong>ce SVM performs better than carrier based PD PWM<br />

with 3 rd harmonic injection (regarding the stated criteria) and the double commutation g<strong>en</strong>erally<br />

outperforms the single commutation approach (for the chos<strong>en</strong> operating points). Note that a<br />

number of issues have not be<strong>en</strong> consi<strong>de</strong>red in the simulations pres<strong>en</strong>ted above. The curr<strong>en</strong>t THD<br />

(which is proportional to the voltage WTHD) varies with modulation <strong>de</strong>pth [35]. This function<br />

over m and the worst case operating points would need to be consi<strong>de</strong>red for a compreh<strong>en</strong>sive<br />

comparison of the modulation schemes. CSPD PWM has not be<strong>en</strong> used in above simulations, as<br />

3 rd harmonic injection has be<strong>en</strong> consi<strong>de</strong>red to be almost equival<strong>en</strong>t. This may make a significant<br />

differ<strong>en</strong>ce in the chos<strong>en</strong> operating point. Apart from that, there are implem<strong>en</strong>tation issues to be<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>red.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!