15.05.2015 Views

Christoph Haederli - Les thèses en ligne de l'INP - Institut National ...

Christoph Haederli - Les thèses en ligne de l'INP - Institut National ...

Christoph Haederli - Les thèses en ligne de l'INP - Institut National ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

46 ML Converter Topologies<br />

<strong>en</strong>ergy in average switching frequ<strong>en</strong>cy limitation while providing full output frequ<strong>en</strong>cy. ANPC1<br />

provi<strong>de</strong>s lowest flying capacitor <strong>en</strong>ergy but it does not yield the highest possible appar<strong>en</strong>t output<br />

switching frequ<strong>en</strong>cy in any of the cases. The ANPC3 provi<strong>de</strong>s highest appar<strong>en</strong>t output switching<br />

frequ<strong>en</strong>cy in all cases while resulting in reasonably low capacitor <strong>en</strong>ergies. Another b<strong>en</strong>efit of the<br />

ANPC3 is its modular structure.<br />

- The ANPC1 is the topology of choice for lowest possible flying capacitor <strong>en</strong>ergy if the<br />

appar<strong>en</strong>t output switching frequ<strong>en</strong>cy does not need to be maximized (in<strong>de</strong>p<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>tly of<br />

type of <strong>de</strong>vice switching frequ<strong>en</strong>cy limitation) or in case an appar<strong>en</strong>t output switching<br />

frequ<strong>en</strong>cy is giv<strong>en</strong>.<br />

- ANPC 2 and SMC are the best choice in average <strong>de</strong>vice switching frequ<strong>en</strong>cy limited<br />

<strong>de</strong>signs<br />

- The ANPC3 is the best choice in systems where the limit is giv<strong>en</strong> by the maximum <strong>de</strong>vice<br />

switching frequ<strong>en</strong>cy and the need of the highest possible appar<strong>en</strong>t output switching<br />

frequ<strong>en</strong>cy. Ev<strong>en</strong> though the ANPC3 has 3 times as many flying capacitors as the ANPC1,<br />

it can double the appar<strong>en</strong>t output switching frequ<strong>en</strong>cy with just 50% more total flying<br />

capacitor <strong>en</strong>ergy.<br />

3.7.6 Comparison with M 2 LC<br />

The M 2 LC has not be<strong>en</strong> inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the previous paragraphs because its flying capacitor <strong>en</strong>ergy<br />

is giv<strong>en</strong> by the fundam<strong>en</strong>tal frequ<strong>en</strong>cy rather than the switching frequ<strong>en</strong>cy. A new constant<br />

including the switching frequ<strong>en</strong>cy is <strong>de</strong>fined in or<strong>de</strong>r to compare:<br />

K<br />

K<br />

E _ cap<br />

2 _ E _ cap<br />

= (25)<br />

fsw<br />

_ base<br />

With (24) we get<br />

E<br />

I<br />

U<br />

FC _ max DC<br />

tot<br />

= K2 _ E _ cap<br />

(26)<br />

2k1<br />

K 2_E_cap can also be <strong>de</strong>fined for the M 2 LC. The <strong>en</strong>ergy in the M2LC flying capacitors can be<br />

calculated as follows, starting from (103) and (9).<br />

E<br />

Iˆ<br />

DC<br />

2<br />

ˆ<br />

2<br />

out<br />

CU<br />

*<br />

ˆ I<br />

_ maxU<br />

C<br />

Iout<br />

UC<br />

N IoutU<br />

DC FC DC<br />

tot<br />

= 2N<br />

= 2N<br />

= N<br />

⎝ ⎠<br />

= =<br />

(27)<br />

2 4ωUˆ<br />

_<br />

*2 k1U<br />

DC 4ωk1<br />

4ωk<br />

cap ac<br />

1<br />

4ω<br />

⎛U<br />

⎜<br />

N<br />

⎞<br />

⎟<br />

2<br />

In or<strong>de</strong>r to be able to compare directly with MC based converters, we <strong>de</strong>fine:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!