01.06.2015 Views

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

70 <strong>Actuarial</strong> <strong>Modelling</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Claim</strong> <strong>Counts</strong><br />

Considering (1.52), the easiest test statistic for H 0 against H 1 is certainly<br />

T =<br />

̂j<br />

̂̂j<br />

which is approximately or0 1 under H 0 , provided the sample size is large enough.<br />

Alternatively, T 2 is approximately Chi-square with one degree <strong>of</strong> freedom. Rejection <strong>of</strong> H 0<br />

occurs when T is large in absolute values, or when T 2 is large. In this case, j is significantly<br />

different from 0, and the associated characteristic has a significant impact in ratemaking.<br />

Note that, as always with hypothesis testing, statistical significance is the resultant <strong>of</strong> two<br />

effects: firstly, the distance between the true parameter value and the hypothesized value,<br />

and secondly, the number <strong>of</strong> observations (or more precisely, the amount <strong>of</strong> information<br />

contained in the data). Even a hypothesis that is approximately true (and useful as a working<br />

hypothesis) will be rejected with a sufficiently large sample. Conversely, any hypothesis may<br />

fail to be rejected (and accepted as a working hypothesis) as long as the actuary has only<br />

scanty data at his disposal. The reader should keep this in mind in the numerical illustrations<br />

worked out in this book.<br />

If the explanatory variables are correlated (as it is usually the case in actuarial studies),<br />

it becomes difficult to disentangle the effects <strong>of</strong> one explanatory variable from another, and<br />

the parameter estimates may be highly dependent on which explanatory variables are used in<br />

the model. If the explanatory variables are strongly correlated then the maximum likelihood<br />

estimators will have a large variance. The actuary should then reduce the set <strong>of</strong> regressors.<br />

2.3.10 Confidence Interval for the Expected Annual <strong>Claim</strong> Frequency<br />

It is possible to build a confidence interval for the annual claim frequency. Recall that<br />

the multivariate Normal distribution has the following useful invariance property. Let C<br />

be a given n × n matrix with real entries and let b be a n-dimensional real vector. If<br />

X ∼ or M then Y = CX + b is orC + b CMC T . The variance <strong>of</strong> the predicted<br />

score, ŝcore i = ˜x T i ̂, is thus given by<br />

which is estimated by<br />

Vŝcore i = ˜x T i ̂˜x i<br />

̂ Vŝcore i = ˜x T i ̂̂˜x i <br />

As the maximum likelihood estimator ̂ is approximately Gaussian when the number <strong>of</strong><br />

policies is large, ŝcore i is also Gaussian and an approximate confidence interval at level<br />

1 − for the annual claim frequency can be computed as<br />

[<br />

exp<br />

(̂T˜x i − z /2<br />

√˜x i T ̂̂˜x<br />

)<br />

i exp<br />

(̂T˜x i + z /2<br />

√˜x i T ̂̂˜x<br />

)]<br />

i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!