01.06.2015 Views

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

252 <strong>Actuarial</strong> <strong>Modelling</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Claim</strong> <strong>Counts</strong><br />

The expected cost <strong>of</strong> a non-reported accident for a policyholder occupying level l is<br />

l = 1<br />

p l <br />

∫ rll<br />

y=0<br />

yfydy<br />

This policyholder will pay on average l × − l per period, because <strong>of</strong> the accidents<br />

not reported to the company. Let us assume that the accident occurrences are uniformly<br />

distributed over the year (so that on average they occur in the middle <strong>of</strong> the year). The<br />

average annual total cost borne by a policyholder in level l is then<br />

CTrll = b l + v 1 2 l − l <br />

where b l is the premium paid at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the year, subject to the bonus-malus scale.<br />

Let V l be the present value <strong>of</strong> all the payments made by a policyholder with annual<br />

expected claim frequency occupying level l. The V l s are obtained from<br />

∑<br />

V l = CTrll + v q l kV Tk l l = 0 1s (5.8)<br />

k=0<br />

If the policyholder reports all the accidents to the company, the system (5.8) coincides with<br />

(5.7). The system (5.8) admits a unique solution. For a given set <strong>of</strong> optimal retentions, the<br />

V l s give the cost <strong>of</strong> the strategy, according to the level occupied in the scale.<br />

Lemaire Algorithm<br />

Let us consider a policyholder in level l who just caused an accident with cost x at time t,<br />

0 ≤ t ≤ 1. There are two possibilities:<br />

(1) Either he does not claim for the accident and the expected present cost is<br />

v −t CTrll + x + v 1−t<br />

<br />

∑<br />

k=0<br />

q l<br />

(<br />

k1 − t<br />

)<br />

VTk+m<br />

l<br />

where m is the number <strong>of</strong> claims that the policyholder has already filed during the year.<br />

(2) Or he reports the accident to the company and the expected present cost is<br />

v −t CTrll + v 1−t<br />

<br />

∑<br />

k=0<br />

q l<br />

(<br />

k1 − t<br />

)<br />

VTk+m+1<br />

l<br />

The retention limit rll is the claim amount x for which the policyholder is indifferent<br />

between the two possibilities: the optimal retentions thus solve<br />

rll = v 1−t<br />

<br />

∑<br />

k=0<br />

( ) ( )<br />

q l k1 − t V Tk+m+1 l − V Tk+m l (5.9)<br />

for l = 0 1s. Note that (5.9) does not provide an explicit expression for the optimal<br />

retention since rll also appears in the q l k1 − ts.<br />

The optimal strategy is obtained using the following algorithm:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!