01.06.2015 Views

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mixed Poisson Models for <strong>Claim</strong> Numbers 43<br />

W = ̂ − 0 ̂̂ − 0 <br />

which is approximately 2 dim distributed under H 0, in large samples. The test statistic can<br />

be interpreted as a measure <strong>of</strong> the distance between the maximum likelihood estimator ̂<br />

and the hypothesized value 0 . The Wald test leads to the rejection <strong>of</strong> H 0 in favor <strong>of</strong> H 1 if<br />

̂ is too far from 0 . Note that the Wald test suffers from the same problems as likelihood<br />

ratio tests when 0 lies on the boundary <strong>of</strong> the parametric space.<br />

Sometimes the calculation <strong>of</strong> the expected information is difficult, and we may use the<br />

observed information instead.<br />

Score Tests<br />

Using the asymptotic theory, we have that U is approximately or0 distributed.<br />

Therefore we can test H 0 = 0 versus H 1 ≠ 0 with the statistic<br />

Q = U 0 I −1 0 U 0 <br />

which is approximately 2 dim distributed under H 0, in large samples.<br />

The advantage <strong>of</strong> the score test is that the calculation <strong>of</strong> the maximum likelihood estimator<br />

̂ is bypassed. Moreover, it remains applicable even if 0 lies on the boundary <strong>of</strong> the<br />

parametric space.<br />

Vuong Test<br />

The Chi-square approximation to the distribution <strong>of</strong> the likelihood ratio test statistic is valid<br />

only for testing restrictions on the parameters <strong>of</strong> a statistical model (i.e., H 0 and H 1 are<br />

nested hypotheses). With non-nested models, we cannot make use <strong>of</strong> likelihood ratio tests for<br />

model comparison. In this case, information criteria like AIC or (S)BIC are useful, as well<br />

as the Vuong test for non-nested models. Recall that the AIC (Akaike Information Criteria),<br />

is given by<br />

AIC =−2L̂ + 2 dim<br />

and the BIC (Bayesian Information Criteria), is given by<br />

BIC =−2L̂ + lnn dim<br />

Both criteria are equal to minus two times the maximum log-likelihood, penalized by a<br />

function <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> observations and sample size.<br />

Vuong (1989) proposed a likelihood ratio-based statistic for testing the null hypothesis<br />

that the competing models are equally close to the true data generating process against the<br />

alternative that one model is closer. Consider two statistical models given by the probability<br />

mass functions p· and q· with dim = dim, and define the likelihood ratio<br />

statistic for the model p· against q· as<br />

k∑<br />

max<br />

LR̂ n ̂ n = f k ln pk̂ n <br />

qk̂ n <br />

k=0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!