01.06.2015 Views

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Credibility</strong> Models for <strong>Claim</strong> <strong>Counts</strong> 155<br />

Table 3.17 Values <strong>of</strong> the a posteriori corrections obtained from (3.17) for different<br />

combinations <strong>of</strong> observed periods T i and number <strong>of</strong> past claims k • for an average driver<br />

(expected annual claim frequency equal to 14.09 %) from Portfolio A, with c = 5.<br />

T i<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> claims k •<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

1 90.8 % 1561 % 221.4 % 286.7 % 352.0 % 417.4 %<br />

2 83.2 % 1429 % 202.6 % 262.4 % 322.1 % 381.8 %<br />

3 76.7 % 1318 % 186.8 % 241.9 % 296.9 % 351.9 %<br />

4 71.2 % 1223 % 173.3 % 224.3 % 275.4 % 326.4 %<br />

5 66.5 % 1141 % 161.7 % 209.2 % 256.8 % 304.4 %<br />

6 62.3 % 1069 % 151.5 % 196.0 % 240.6 % 285.2 %<br />

7 58.7 % 1006 % 142.5 % 184.4 % 226.3 % 268.2 %<br />

8 55.4 % 950 % 134.5 % 174.1 % 213.7 % 253.2 %<br />

9 52.5 % 900 % 127.4 % 164.9 % 202.4 % 239.8 %<br />

10 49.9 % 855 % 121.0 % 156.6 % 192.2 % 227.8 %<br />

Table 3.18 Values <strong>of</strong> the a posteriori corrections obtained from (3.17) for different<br />

combinations <strong>of</strong> observed periods T i and number <strong>of</strong> past claims k • for a bad driver<br />

(expected annual claim frequency equal to 28.40 %) from Portfolio A, with c = 5.<br />

T i<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> claims k •<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

1 85.6 % 1363 % 186.9 % 237.5 % 288.2 % 338.8 %<br />

2 75.0 % 1190 % 163.1 % 207.2 % 251.2 % 295.3 %<br />

3 66.7 % 1058 % 144.8 % 183.8 % 222.9 % 261.9 %<br />

4 60.2 % 952 % 130.3 % 165.3 % 200.4 % 235.5 %<br />

5 54.8 % 866 % 118.5 % 150.3 % 182.1 % 213.9 %<br />

6 50.3 % 795 % 108.6 % 137.8 % 166.9 % 196.1 %<br />

7 46.5 % 734 % 100.3 % 127.2 % 154.1 % 181.0 %<br />

8 43.3 % 682 % 93.2 % 118.2 % 143.1 % 168.1 %<br />

9 40.4 % 637 % 87.0 % 110.3 % 133.6 % 156.9 %<br />

10 38.0 % 598 % 81.6 % 103.5 % 125.3 % 147.2 %<br />

3.5 Dependence in the Mixed Poisson <strong>Credibility</strong> Model<br />

3.5.1 Intuitive Ideas<br />

The main focus <strong>of</strong> this section is to formalize intuitive ideas with the help <strong>of</strong> stochastic<br />

orderings. Every actuary intuitively feels that the a posteriori claim frequency distribution<br />

must become more dangerous as more claims are reported. Here we precisely define ‘more<br />

dangerous’ and explain that the a posteriori premium must increase with the total claim<br />

number in the mixed Poisson model.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!