01.06.2015 Views

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

148 <strong>Actuarial</strong> <strong>Modelling</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Claim</strong> <strong>Counts</strong><br />

Hence, the value <strong>of</strong> c is does not depend on s and the same weight is given to all the past<br />

annual claim numbers. Now, inserting the value <strong>of</strong> c is that we just obtained in (3.14) finally<br />

gives<br />

which in turn yields.<br />

c i0 =<br />

c is =<br />

iTi +1<br />

1 + V i ∑ T i<br />

t=1 it<br />

iTi +1V i <br />

1 + V i ∑ T i<br />

t=1 <br />

it<br />

The expected claim frequency for year T i + 1 given past claims history is<br />

̂N iTi +1 = iTi +1<br />

1 + V i N i•<br />

1 + V i i•<br />

(3.16)<br />

where N i• and i• have been defined in (3.1). Note that ̂N iTi +1 is the best linear predictor<br />

<strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the true unknown means iTi +1 i , <strong>of</strong> the Bayesian credibility premium<br />

EN iTi +1N i1 N iTi and <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> claims N iTi +1 for year T i + 1.<br />

The linear predictor for year T i + 1 thus appears as the product <strong>of</strong> the a priori<br />

expected claim frequency, iTi +1, times an approximation <strong>of</strong> the theoretical correction<br />

E i N i1 N iTi . This approximation possesses a particularly simple interpretation since<br />

it entails a malus when N i• > i• , that is, if the policyholder reported more claims than<br />

expected a priori.<br />

Remark 3.2 Note that (3.16) agrees with the result obtained in the Poisson-Gamma case.<br />

This is because the Bayesian credibility premium is linear in the past observations in the<br />

Poisson-Gamma case. The term exact credibility is used to describe the situation where<br />

the linear credibility premium equals the Bayesian one. Intuitively speaking, using linear<br />

credibility formulas in the mixed Poisson model boils down to approximating the mixing<br />

distribution with the Gamma distribution (or, equivalently, the distribution <strong>of</strong> the claim<br />

numbers with the Negative Binomial one).<br />

Remark 3.3 Note that ̂N iTi +1 could have been obtained by a direct application <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Bühlmann–Straub formula. Let us consider a sequence <strong>of</strong> random variables X 1 X 2 X 3 <br />

such that, given a random variable , the X t s are independent, with finite first and second<br />

moments<br />

Now, define M 2 and 2 as<br />

= EX t and EX t = = E<br />

E [ VX t ] = 2<br />

w t<br />

and V [ EX t ] = M 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!