01.06.2015 Views

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Credibility</strong> Models for <strong>Claim</strong> <strong>Counts</strong> 139<br />

Table 3.7<br />

Lower s<br />

and upper s bounds in (3.8) for s = 2to5.<br />

s s<br />

s<br />

2 2 1<br />

b 1<br />

3<br />

4<br />

2 2<br />

( ) b1 − 3<br />

2 b − 1 2<br />

1 b − 1 b − 1 2 + + 2<br />

2 b3<br />

b − 1 2 + 2<br />

(<br />

1 − )<br />

1 − r −<br />

r− 4 r + − r + ( )<br />

1 − r −<br />

3 − b 4<br />

r+ 4 p 2<br />

− r + − r 1 + p<br />

− 2 − b 2 b 4<br />

1<br />

5 q + t 5 + + q −t 5 −<br />

p + z 5 + + p −z 5 − + 1 − p + − p − b 5<br />

Now, let X ∈ s 0 b . The sth canonical moment <strong>of</strong> X, denoted as c s X, is given<br />

by<br />

c s X = EXs − s<br />

<br />

s − s<br />

Thus, c s X is simply the position <strong>of</strong> the sth moment <strong>of</strong> X relative to its possible range.<br />

Now, c s X gives a good indication <strong>of</strong> the ‘position’ <strong>of</strong> X in s 0 b with respect to<br />

the extrema X s<br />

min<br />

and Xs max. Therefore, we might expect that a satisfactory approximation<br />

<strong>of</strong> X ∈ s 0 b is furnished by a convex combination <strong>of</strong> the stochastic extrema in<br />

s−1 0 b with weights depending on the s − 1th canonical moment c s−1 X, i.e. we<br />

use the mixture<br />

˜X s =<br />

{<br />

X<br />

s−1<br />

min<br />

X s−1<br />

max<br />

with probability 1 − c s−1 X<br />

with probability c s−1 X<br />

(3.9)<br />

in order to approximate X. In the following, we refer to ˜X s as the sth canonical approximation<br />

<strong>of</strong> X. It is easily seen that ˜X s ∈ s 0 b .<br />

The Unimodal Case<br />

A purely discrete approximation to the risk parameter i causes problems when an experience<br />

rating plan has to be designed, as shown in Walhin & Paris (1999). The a posteriori<br />

corrections obtained with discrete i s exhibit plateaus before and after sudden jumps,<br />

which is commercially unacceptable. When F only has a few support points, a ‘block’<br />

structure is clearly apparent for the credibility coefficients, each block with almost constant<br />

a posteriori corrections corresponding to one support point <strong>of</strong> F . The policyholder is<br />

transferred from smaller to larger mass points as more claims are filed. In order to avoid<br />

this, we need a smooth risk distribution. Therefore, we would like to have simple continuous<br />

approximations to the risk parameter. This can be done in the unimodal case, as shown<br />

below.<br />

A situation <strong>of</strong> practical interest in actuarial sciences is when the random variables under<br />

consideration are known to have a unimodal distribution with a given mode m, together<br />

with the fixed moments 1 2 s−1 . The Gamma, LogNormal and Inverse Gaussian

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!