01.06.2015 Views

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Transient Maximum Accuracy Criterion 297<br />

8.3 Quadratic Loss Function<br />

8.3.1 Transient Maximum Accuracy Criterion<br />

In this chapter, a policyholder picked at random from the portfolio is now characterized by<br />

three random variables: , and A. As before, is the expected claim frequency derived<br />

from the a priori ratemaking and the residual effect due to the heterogeneity remaining<br />

inside each risk class. The integer-valued random variable A then represents the age <strong>of</strong> the<br />

policy in the portfolio and will enable us to take the transient behaviour <strong>of</strong> a bonus-malus<br />

system into account. The probability mass function <strong>of</strong> A is denoted as<br />

PrA = n = a n n= 1 2<br />

In words, this means that a proportion a n <strong>of</strong> the policies in the portfolio have been in force<br />

for n years.<br />

We have already seen that the assumption <strong>of</strong> the independence between and is<br />

reasonable. As for and A, it seems that they are likely to be correlated. Indeed, it seems<br />

probable that the age <strong>of</strong> the policyholder, which is included in the a priori ratemaking, is<br />

correlated with the age <strong>of</strong> the policy. However, in order to simplify the computation, we will<br />

further assume that and A are independent. We also assume the independence between <br />

and A.<br />

Recall from Chapter 4 that the sequence <strong>of</strong> levels occupied by the policyholder in the<br />

bonus-malus scale is denoted as L 0 L 1 L 2 . Here, we denote as L A the level occupied<br />

by a policyholder subject to the bonus-malus system for A years. Let us assume that the<br />

relativity applied to a policyholder picked at random from the portfolio is r A<br />

L A<br />

. For a<br />

policyholder with age <strong>of</strong> policy n, this relativity becomes r n<br />

L n<br />

. As a result, for each group <strong>of</strong><br />

policyholders with age <strong>of</strong> policy n, the goal is then to minimize the expected squared rating<br />

error<br />

[ ∣ ] [ ]<br />

Q n = E − r A<br />

L A<br />

2 ∣∣A = n = E − r n<br />

L n<br />

2<br />

The solution is given by<br />

= ∑ k<br />

w k<br />

∫ +<br />

0<br />

s∑<br />

− r n<br />

l<br />

2 p n<br />

l kdF (8.3)<br />

l=0<br />

r n<br />

l<br />

= EL A = l A = n<br />

∫ + ∑k w k p n<br />

0 l<br />

=<br />

kdF <br />

∫ + ∑k w k p n<br />

0 l kdF (8.4)<br />

We see that (4.13) is a limiting form <strong>of</strong> equation (8.4) when n tends to infinity.<br />

The asymptotic criterion Q seems reasonable when a majority <strong>of</strong> the risks are close to<br />

the steady state. In practice, however, real portfolios will <strong>of</strong>ten have a substantial fraction <strong>of</strong><br />

comparatively young policies. Then it is desirable to obtain a solution for the relativities not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!