01.06.2015 Views

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

168 <strong>Actuarial</strong> <strong>Modelling</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Claim</strong> <strong>Counts</strong><br />

insurer, he must first obtain a certificate from the former insurer stating his attained bonusmalus<br />

level and whether pending claims could affect this level. The new insurer must then<br />

award the same discount or apply the same surcharges. The competition between insurance<br />

companies is limited to the services <strong>of</strong>fered and the a priori premiums.<br />

Things become more complicated in a deregulated market, where each insurer is free to<br />

design its own bonus-malus system. Then, insurers compete also on the basis <strong>of</strong> a posteriori<br />

corrections. It rapidly becomes extremely difficult for policyholders to determine the optimal<br />

insurance provider, since companies apply different penalties when claims are reported. In<br />

Section 4.8, we consider a policyholder switching from insurer A to insurer B. He occupies<br />

the level l 1 in the bonus-malus scale used by company A, and the question is where to place<br />

him in the bonus-malus scale used by company B.<br />

Section 4.9 examines the dependence properties existing between the successive levels<br />

occupied by the policyholders and the random risk parameter. It is argued that contrarily to<br />

the results obtained with credibility models, the risk parameters do not necessarily increase<br />

with the level occupied in the scale.<br />

The final Section 4.10 gives references and addresses further issues.<br />

4.2 <strong>Modelling</strong> Bonus-Malus Systems<br />

4.2.1 Typical Bonus-Malus Scales<br />

Before embarking on an abstract definition <strong>of</strong> bonus-malus systems, let us discuss a couple<br />

<strong>of</strong> examples that will be used throughout this chapter.<br />

Example 4.1 (−1/Top Scale) This bonus-malus scale has 6 levels (numbered 0 to 5).<br />

Policyholders are classified according to the number <strong>of</strong> claim-free years since their last claim<br />

(0, 1, 2, 3, 4 or at least 5). After a claim all premium reductions are lost. The transition rules<br />

are described in Table 4.1. Specifically, the starting class is the highest level 5. Each claimfree<br />

year is rewarded by one bonus class. When an accident is reported, all the discounts are<br />

lost and the policyholder is transferred to level 5.<br />

Note that the philosophy behind such a bonus-malus system is different from credibility<br />

theory. Indeed, this bonus-malus scale only aims to counteract moral hazard: it is in fact<br />

more or less equivalent to a deductible which is not paid at once but smoothed over the time<br />

Table 4.1 Transition rules for<br />

the scale −1/top.<br />

Starting Level occupied if<br />

level 0 ≥ 1<br />

claim is reported<br />

0 0 5<br />

1 0 5<br />

2 1 5<br />

3 2 5<br />

4 3 5<br />

5 4 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!