01.06.2015 Views

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Classification</strong> 89<br />

2.8 <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Classification</strong> for Portfolio A<br />

So far, we have several competing models for the observed claim frequencies in Portfolio<br />

A. This section purposes to compare these models in order to select the optimal one.<br />

2.8.1 Comparison <strong>of</strong> Competing models with the Vuong Test<br />

Let us consider two non-nested competing models for the number <strong>of</strong> claims, with respective<br />

probability mass functions p·x and q·x , where x is a vector <strong>of</strong> explanatory<br />

variables, and and include the regression parameters as well as some dispersion<br />

coefficients . The corresponding log-likelihoods are<br />

L p =<br />

L q =<br />

n∑<br />

ln pk i x i <br />

i=1<br />

n∑<br />

ln qk i x i <br />

In this regression context, the test statistic proposed by Vuong (1989) is<br />

i=1<br />

T LRNN = L p̂ − L q ̂<br />

√ n<br />

(2.14)<br />

where<br />

2 = 1 n<br />

(<br />

n∑<br />

i=1<br />

ln pk ix i ̂<br />

qk i x i ̂<br />

) 2<br />

−<br />

(<br />

1<br />

n<br />

n∑<br />

i=1<br />

)<br />

ln pk 2<br />

ix i ̂<br />

(2.15)<br />

qk i x i ̂<br />

is the estimate <strong>of</strong> the variance <strong>of</strong> the log-likelihood difference. None <strong>of</strong> the model has to<br />

be true: the test is aimed at selecting the model that is the closer to the true conditional<br />

distribution. The null hypothesis <strong>of</strong> the test is that the two models are equivalent. Under the<br />

null hypothesis, the test statistic is asymptotically Normally distributed. Rejection in favour<br />

<strong>of</strong> p happens when T LRNN >c or in favour <strong>of</strong> q if T LRNN < −c, where c represents the<br />

or 0 1 critical value for some significance level. If T LRNN ≤c then the null hypothesis<br />

is not rejected and the Vuong test cannot discriminate between the two models, given the data.<br />

Now, comparing the three mixed Poisson models with the Vuong test gives:<br />

Negative Binomial against Poisson-Inverse Gaussian<br />

to −0754544 leading to a p-value <strong>of</strong> 4506 %.<br />

the value <strong>of</strong> the test statistic is equal<br />

Poisson-LogNormal against Negative Binomial<br />

to −0470894 leading to a p-value <strong>of</strong> 6378 %.<br />

the value <strong>of</strong> the test statistic is equal to<br />

Poisson-LogNormal against Poisson-Inverse Gaussian the value <strong>of</strong> the test statistic is<br />

equal to to −0216702 leading to a p-value <strong>of</strong> 8284 %.<br />

These results do not enable us to distinguish between the three models which are<br />

therefore statistically equivalent. The Negative Binomial model will be used for the numerical

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!