01.06.2015 Views

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mixed Poisson Models for <strong>Claim</strong> Numbers 41<br />

1.5.4 Hypothesis Tests<br />

Sample Distribution <strong>of</strong> Individual Parameters<br />

Standard hypothesis tests about parameters in maximum likelihood models are handled quite<br />

easily, thanks to the asymptotic Normal distribution <strong>of</strong> the maximum likelihood estimator.<br />

Specifically, we use the fact that<br />

̂j − j<br />

̂j<br />

is approximately or0 1<br />

where the standard deviation ̂j<br />

<strong>of</strong> ̂ j is the square root <strong>of</strong> the jth diagonal element <strong>of</strong><br />

̂<br />

= −1 <br />

Such tests will be useful in Chapter 2 to select the relevant risk factors.<br />

In practice, <strong>of</strong>ten involves unknown parameters so that it is estimated by the jth<br />

̂j<br />

element <strong>of</strong> ̂̂j<br />

̂̂<br />

= ̂ −1 <br />

In such a case, ̂ j − j is approximately Student’s distributed with n − 1 degrees<br />

/̂̂j<br />

<strong>of</strong> freedom. This is the familiar z-score for a standard Normal variable developed in all<br />

introductory statistics classes. The Normality <strong>of</strong> maximum likelihood estimates means that<br />

our testing <strong>of</strong> hypotheses about the parameters is as simple as calculating the z-score and<br />

finding the associated p-value from a table or by calling a s<strong>of</strong>tware function.<br />

The hypothesis test is based on Student’s t-distribution. However, because the maximum<br />

likelihood properties are all asymptotic we are unable to address the finite sample distribution.<br />

Asymptotically, the Student’s t-distribution converges to the Normal as the degrees for<br />

freedom grow, so that using or0 1 p-values in the maximum likelihood test is the same<br />

as the t-test as long as the number <strong>of</strong> cases is large enough. Specifically,<br />

̂j − j<br />

̂̂j<br />

is approximately or0 1 (1.52)<br />

if the sample size n is large enough.<br />

In addition to the test <strong>of</strong> hypotheses about a single parameter, there are three classical<br />

tests that encompass hypotheses about sets <strong>of</strong> parameters as well as one parameter at a time:<br />

the likelihood ratio, Wald, and Lagrange multiplier tests. All are asymptotically equivalent,<br />

but they differ in the ease <strong>of</strong> implementation depending on the particular case. Here, we will<br />

present Wald, likelihood ratio and Vuong tests, as well as the Score test.<br />

Likelihood Ratio Test<br />

This test is based on a comparison <strong>of</strong> maximized likelihoods for nested models. Specifically,<br />

the null hypothesis H 0 corresponds to a constrained model with dim − j parameters,<br />

whereas the alternative H 1 corresponds to the full model with dim parameters. Most <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!