01.06.2015 Views

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

208 <strong>Actuarial</strong> <strong>Modelling</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Claim</strong> <strong>Counts</strong><br />

so that<br />

r l = r l1 = r l2 =···=r lnl <br />

l= 0 1s<br />

n<br />

∑ l<br />

The solution to this problem is the same as above. We merely have to replace l by li .<br />

The results are displayed in Table 4.23. The constant step between two levels <strong>of</strong> the linear<br />

scale is equal to 99 % and the value <strong>of</strong> the mean square error is Q = 041779. The major<br />

advantage <strong>of</strong> the linear scale is that it gives a system that is commercially more acceptable.<br />

i=1<br />

4.8 Change <strong>of</strong> Scale<br />

4.8.1 Migration from One Scale to Another<br />

Since the 90s insurance markets in the EU have been deregulated. More competition is<br />

allowed. Two related problems arise with the deregulation <strong>of</strong> the bonus-malus systems. The<br />

first one consists <strong>of</strong> transferring the policyholders to the new scales. The second one is more<br />

difficult: it consists <strong>of</strong> transferring a new policyholder to the scale <strong>of</strong> the company knowing<br />

his level in the scale <strong>of</strong> his previous insurer.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> the present section is to show how to develop rules allowing the transfer<br />

<strong>of</strong> a policyholder to a bonus-malus scale knowing his level in his previous bonus-malus<br />

scale. The a posteriori probability density function <strong>of</strong> given the level L occupied in the<br />

bonus-malus scale is given by<br />

f L=l = PrL = l = f <br />

PrL = l<br />

∑<br />

k <br />

=<br />

k l k dF <br />

∫ ∑k k 0 l k dF <br />

Because we want to move a policyholder from one scale to the other, we should try to put<br />

the policyholder at a level which is as close as possible to his level in his original bonusmalus<br />

scale. By ‘close’, we mean here having the a posteriori random effect as close as<br />

possible.<br />

4.8.2 Kolmogorov Distance<br />

In addition to the total variation distance d TV used previously, we also need the Kolmogorov<br />

distance. The Kolmogorov (or uniform) metric based on the well-known Kolmogorov-<br />

Smirnov statistic (associated with the goodness-<strong>of</strong>-fit test with that name), is defined<br />

as follows: The Kolmogorov distance d K between the random variables X and Y is<br />

given by<br />

d K X Y = sup F X t − F Y t (4.24)<br />

t∈<br />

Given two random variables X and Y , we have that d K X Y ≤ d TV X Y. This result is<br />

an immediate consequence <strong>of</strong> (4.11) since F X t = PrX ∈ t +.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!