01.06.2015 Views

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Actuarial</strong> Analysis <strong>of</strong> the French Bonus-Malus System 341<br />

As f ⋆t is the t-fold convolution <strong>of</strong> a lattice random vector, we will apply the trivariate<br />

extension <strong>of</strong> De Pril’s algorithm described in Property 9.2. As this algorithm needs a mass<br />

at the origin, we define an auxilliary density function<br />

g ⋆t x y z = f ⋆t x t − y z<br />

Using similar arguments as before we obtain the following recursion<br />

( )<br />

x∑ z∑ t + 1<br />

g ⋆t x y z = e 1+<br />

− 1 g ⋆t x − u y − 1z− wgu 1w<br />

y<br />

u=0 w=0<br />

□<br />

9.3.4 Numerical Illustrations<br />

To illustrate this special case, we use the same parameters as in Section 9.2.8. We assume<br />

that 20 % <strong>of</strong> the claims concern partial liability, that is q = 02. We numerically solve the<br />

system <strong>of</strong> two equations for different values <strong>of</strong> . Table 9.4 gives the results. As before, t<br />

and t decrease with t and an averaging is needed to get a unique set <strong>of</strong> parameters.<br />

The total income <strong>of</strong> the company is not much influenced by the value <strong>of</strong> , and is quite<br />

close to the values listed in Table 9.1.<br />

To obtain unique values for the CRM coefficients, we choose the first age distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

Section 9.2.8. The minimization <strong>of</strong><br />

E A =<br />

∑<br />

a t t <br />

then gives the values displayed in Table 9.5. The same comments apply to this case.<br />

Specifically, the t s with large values <strong>of</strong> t play the prominent role, giving optimal<br />

CRM coefficients close to the values obtained with t>20 in Table 9.1.<br />

The values <strong>of</strong> the optimal CRM coefficients displayed in Table 9.5 are again much smaller<br />

than those implemented by the French law. As before, this is due to the special bonus rule<br />

<strong>of</strong> the French system (after two consecutive years without claim, the driver goes back to the<br />

initial level <strong>of</strong> 100 %).<br />

t=1<br />

Table 9.4 Parameters t and t and financial equilibrium for different values <strong>of</strong> t and .<br />

t = 15 = 20 = 25<br />

t t Financial<br />

equilibrium<br />

t t Financial<br />

equilibrium<br />

t t Financial<br />

equilibrium<br />

1 0.4336 0.1423 09747 0.3316 0.1423 0.9729 0.2674 0.1423 09714<br />

2 0.3253 0.0954 09870 0.2498 0.0953 0.9850 0.2022 0.0953 09832<br />

3 0.2616 0.0727 09984 0.2014 0.0726 0.9965 0.1633 0.0726 09946<br />

4 0.2194 0.0589 10083 0.1692 0.0589 1.0062 0.1374 0.0588 10047<br />

10 0.1128 0.0279 10419 0.0873 0.0279 1.0402 0.0711 0.0279 10386<br />

20 0.0627 0.0149 10634 0.0486 0.0149 1.0624 0.0397 0.0149 10617<br />

30 0.0435 0.0102 10725 0.0337 0.0102 1.0707 0.0276 0.0102 10712

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!