01.06.2015 Views

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

248 <strong>Actuarial</strong> <strong>Modelling</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Claim</strong> <strong>Counts</strong><br />

transferred after the first claim has been reported. Here, we only use the observations related<br />

to the policyholders having filed a single standard claim during the observation period (so<br />

that we have the exact cost <strong>of</strong> this claim at our disposal). Also, the estimation <strong>of</strong> f could<br />

be performed in a nonparametric way, allowing for an effect fl i <strong>of</strong> being in level l i (and<br />

imposing some smoothness in the fls if needed) before selecting an appropriate parametric<br />

specification.<br />

Let us now apply this methodology to Portfolio C. The policyholders have been subject<br />

to the 23-level former compulsory Belgian bonus-malus scale. The estimation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

regression parameters in the model containing all the explanatory variables are displayed in<br />

Table 5.12. Here, we take fl = l − 13 2 . The log-likelihood is −130 1542565. We see<br />

from this table that several covariates are not significant. Therefore, we adopt a backward<br />

selection procedure, and exclude the irrelevant covariates. This yields the results displayed in<br />

Table 5.13. The log-likelihood is now −130 1554197. The parameters and are estimated<br />

at ̂ = 16821 and ̂ = 10286.<br />

Compared to the LogNormal fit to the claim costs displayed in Table 5.5, we see that<br />

the intercept is now smaller, as expected. The age classes have been modified, and the<br />

young drivers seem to cause more expensive accidents. The effect <strong>of</strong> the covariate City<br />

remains approximately the same. The categories for the age <strong>of</strong> the vehicle have also been<br />

modified.<br />

Table 5.12 Fit <strong>of</strong> the model for the accident costs subject to bonus hunger in Portfolio C, containing<br />

all the explanatory variables.<br />

Variable Level Coeff Std error Wald 95 % conf limits Chi-sq Pr>Chi-sq<br />

Intercept 58028 00453 57122 58934 1640911 < 00001<br />

Ageph 18−24 02624 00640 01344 03903 1682 < 00001<br />

Ageph > 60 00717 00500 −00282 01716 206 01512<br />

Ageph 25−60 0 0 0 0 . .<br />

City Rural 00459 00275 −00091 01009 279 00948<br />

City Urban 0 0 0 0 . .<br />

Agev 0−2 00327 00652 −00977 01631 025 06158<br />

Agev 3−5 −01721 00465 −02652 −00791 1369 00002<br />

Agev 6−10 −01445 00357 −02159 −00732 1640 00001<br />

Agev > 10 0 0 0 0 . .<br />

Variable Level Coeff Std error Wald 95 % conf limits Chi-sq Pr>Chi-sq<br />

Intercept 35045 00904 33238 36852 150445 < 00001<br />

Ageph 18−24 −03244 01637 −06519 00031 393 00476<br />

Ageph > 60 05419 01105 03209 07630 2405 < 00001<br />

Ageph 25−60 0 0 0 0 . .<br />

City Rural 00796 00416 −00036 01628 366 00558<br />

City Urban 0 0 0 0 . .<br />

Agev 0−2 −07825 02621 −13067 −02582 891 00028<br />

Agev 3−5 −03406 01107 −05620 −01193 947 00021<br />

Agev 6−10 00190 00449 −00708 01087 018 06725<br />

Agev > 10 0 0 0 0 . .<br />

BM level −00011 00006 −00022 00000 367 00555

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!