01.06.2015 Views

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Credibility</strong> Models for <strong>Claim</strong> <strong>Counts</strong> 145<br />

Table 3.10 Values <strong>of</strong> E i N i• = k • for different combinations <strong>of</strong> observed periods T i and<br />

number <strong>of</strong> past claims k • for a good driver from Portfolio A (expected annual claim frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

9.28 %) and for a mixture <strong>of</strong> mixed uniform approximations <strong>of</strong> i (improved 4-convex extrema).<br />

T i<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> claims k •<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

1 91.98 % 178.36 % 264.74 % 351.04 % 437.76 % 524.92 %<br />

2 85.16 % 165.12 % 245.13 % 325.04 % 404.57 % 486.88 %<br />

3 79.28 % 153.70 % 228.23 % 302.76 % 376.26 % 451.61 %<br />

4 74.16 % 143.77 % 213.51 % 283.40 % 352.14 % 420.74 %<br />

5 69.66 % 135.06 % 200.54 % 266.38 % 331.27 % 394.52 %<br />

6 65.67 % 127.37 % 189.00 % 251.28 % 312.83 % 372.29 %<br />

7 62.18 % 120.55 % 178.65 % 237.81 % 296.27 % 353.06 %<br />

8 58.93 % 114.47 % 169.29 % 225.73 % 281.26 % 335.95 %<br />

9 56.05 % 109.04 % 160.80 % 214.82 % 267.62 % 320.35 %<br />

10 53.43 % 104.17 % 153.05 % 204.90 % 255.23 % 305.90 %<br />

Table 3.11 Values <strong>of</strong> E i N i• = k • for different combinations <strong>of</strong> observed periods T i and<br />

number <strong>of</strong> past claims k • for an average driver from Portfolio A (expected annual claim frequency<br />

<strong>of</strong> 14.09 %) and for a mixture <strong>of</strong> mixed uniform approximations <strong>of</strong> i (improved 4-convex<br />

extrema).<br />

T i<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> claims k •<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

1 88.32 % 171.25 % 254.21 % 337.07 % 419.97 % 505.05 %<br />

2 79.09 % 153.34 % 227.69 % 302.05 % 375.37 % 450.47 %<br />

3 71.60 % 138.83 % 206.16 % 273.75 % 340.28 % 405.73 %<br />

4 65.41 % 126.87 % 188.25 % 250.30 % 311.63 % 370.88 %<br />

5 60.21 % 116.90 % 173.05 % 230.58 % 287.30 % 342.82 %<br />

6 55.76 % 108.51 % 159.96 % 213.75 % 266.28 % 318.81 %<br />

7 51.93 % 101.38 % 148.58 % 199.16 % 248.12 % 297.44 %<br />

8 48.58 % 95.27 % 138.64 % 186.29 % 232.40 % 278.28 %<br />

9 45.63 % 89.96 % 129.95 % 174.75 % 218.71 % 261.30 %<br />

10 43.01 % 85.30 % 122.35 % 164.32 % 206.58 % 246.42 %<br />

is constrained ex ante to be linear in past observations, i.e. the predictor ˆN iTi +1 <strong>of</strong> N iTi +1 is<br />

<strong>of</strong> the form<br />

T<br />

∑ i<br />

ˆN iTi +1 = c i0 + c it N it<br />

The coefficients c i0 and the c it s involved in ˆN iTi +1 are obtained from the minimization <strong>of</strong> an<br />

expected squared difference.<br />

t=1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!