01.06.2015 Views

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bonus-Malus Scales 215<br />

No explicit expressions are available for the optimal and , which must be determined<br />

numerically.<br />

As pointed out by Subramanian (1998), the market shares <strong>of</strong> competitors in a given<br />

market can be strongly affected when some insurers adopt an agressive competitive behaviour<br />

by modifying the bonus-malus systems. In a deregulated market, insurers have an incentive<br />

to innovate in their pricing decisions by partitioning their portfolios (a priori ratemaking)<br />

and by designing new bonus-malus systems (a posteriori ratemaking). Viswanathan &<br />

Lemaire (2005) examined the evolution <strong>of</strong> market shares and claim frequencies in a twocompany<br />

market, when one insurer breaks <strong>of</strong>f the existing stability by introducing a super<br />

discount class in its bonus-malus system.<br />

To end with, let us point out a final remark <strong>of</strong> primary importance. Merit-rating structures<br />

in automobile insurance require the insured to decide whether to file a claim for an accident<br />

when he is at fault. Since the penalties are independent <strong>of</strong> the claim amounts, one could<br />

imagine that some policyholders prefer to carry the cost <strong>of</strong> the accident themselves in order<br />

to avoid the premium increase in the future. Therefore, the data the actuary has at his disposal<br />

are contingent on the actual bonus-malus system and are ‘censored’ in a very complicated<br />

way. Hence, the policyholder might modify their behaviour when a new bonus-malus system<br />

is introduced, resulting in an increasing (or decreasing) number <strong>of</strong> reported claims. This is<br />

a particularly important side-effect when a bonus-malus system is modified. We will come<br />

back to this issue in Chapter 5.<br />

The numerical results presented in this chapter can be obtained using s<strong>of</strong>tware such as<br />

SAS R or R. There is also a specific s<strong>of</strong>tware package, called BM-builder, which works in<br />

the SAS R environment and allows for actuarial computations related to bonus-malus scales.<br />

It has been developed by ReacFin SA, which is a spin-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> the Université Catholique de<br />

Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, created in January 2004 by the authors. Reacfin’s aim<br />

is to provide actuarial solutions to its clients. Its strong link with the university guarantees<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> up-to-date techniques. BM-builder aims to compute the relativities attached to<br />

the different levels <strong>of</strong> a bonus-malus scale, taking into account the actual structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

insurance portfolio. In that respect, it properly integrates the interactions between a priori<br />

and a posteriori ratemakings and allows for an efficient ratemaking. For more details, see<br />

http://www.reacfin.com.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!