01.06.2015 Views

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

Actuarial Modelling of Claim Counts Risk Classification, Credibility ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Classification</strong> 67<br />

The computation is easier if we change the likelihood to the log-likelihood which is then<br />

given by<br />

L = ln =<br />

n∑<br />

i=1<br />

(<br />

− ln k i !+k i ln i − i<br />

)<br />

(2.2)<br />

The maximum likelihood estimators ̂ 0 and the ̂ j s are the solutions <strong>of</strong> the following<br />

likelihood equations that are obtained by making the first derivatives <strong>of</strong> the log-likelihood<br />

with respect to the regression coefficients equal to zero:<br />

<br />

0<br />

L = 0 ⇔<br />

n∑<br />

k i − i = 0 (2.3)<br />

i=1<br />

<br />

j<br />

L = 0 ⇔<br />

n∑<br />

x ij k i − i = 0 j = 1p (2.4)<br />

i=1<br />

2.3.6 Interpretation <strong>of</strong> the Likelihood Equations<br />

Equation (2.3) has an obvious interpretation: the fitted total number <strong>of</strong> claims ∑ n<br />

i=1̂ i is<br />

equal to the observed total number <strong>of</strong> claims ∑ n<br />

i=1 k i. Therefore, provided that an intercept<br />

0 is included in the score, the total claim number predicted by the regression model equals<br />

its observed counterpart. Note that this equality holds for the observation period and not<br />

necessarily for the future, when the ratemaking will be implemented in practice. In other<br />

words, we cannot be sure that ∑ n<br />

i=1̂ i claims will be filed in the future, just that the actual<br />

number <strong>of</strong> claims should be close to ∑ n<br />

i=1̂ i if the yearly number <strong>of</strong> claims filed to the<br />

company remains stable over time.<br />

The interpretation <strong>of</strong> the second likelihood Equation (2.4) is as follows: In Example 2.2<br />

with Portfolio A, Equation (2.4) for j = 4 gives<br />

∑<br />

females<br />

k i = ∑<br />

females<br />

Therefore, the model fits exactly the total number <strong>of</strong> claims filed by female policyholders.<br />

There is no cross-subsidies between men and women. The conclusion is similar for the other<br />

values <strong>of</strong> j. For j = 1 2 3 for instance, the Equations (2.4) thus ensure that the sum <strong>of</strong> all<br />

the claims reported for each age category is exactly reproduced by the model.<br />

̂i <br />

2.3.7 Solving the Likelihood Equations with the Newton–Raphson<br />

Algorithm<br />

The likelihood equations do not admit explicit solutions and must therefore be solved<br />

numerically. Let U be the gradient vector <strong>of</strong> the log-likelihood L = ln defined

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!