11.07.2015 Views

T.F. Green Airport Improvement Program - FEIS Chapters - PVD

T.F. Green Airport Improvement Program - FEIS Chapters - PVD

T.F. Green Airport Improvement Program - FEIS Chapters - PVD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

T.F. <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Airport</strong> <strong>Improvement</strong> <strong>Program</strong>Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation5.9 Department of Transportation Act: Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) ResourcesThis section summarizes the Section 4(f) resources within the Study Area that could be impacted by the<strong>Improvement</strong> <strong>Program</strong>. Refer to Chapter 7, Final Section 4(f)/Section 6(f) Evaluation, for the complete impactanalysis for Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) resources, including the methodology for determining potential impactsto these resources and an alternatives analysis.5.9.1 Regulatory ContextRefer to Chapter 7, Final Section 4(f)/Section 6(f) Evaluation, Section 7.2, Regulatory Context, for a discussion onregulatory context for Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) resources.5.9.2 Significance ThresholdThe analysis considers impacts of the No-Action Alternative and Alternatives B2 and B4 pursuant to FAAguidance, to gain a full understanding of the Section 4(f) resources in the Project Area and Study Area.5.9.2.1 Finding: Significant Section 4(f) Resources ImpactsAccording to FAA Order 1050.1E, a significant impact would occur pursuant to NEPA when a proposed actioneither involves more than a minimal physical use of a Section 4(f) property or is deemed a “constructive use”substantially impairing the 4(f) property, and mitigation measures do not eliminate or reduce the effects of the usebelow the threshold of significance (Table 5-6). Alternatives B2 and B4 both result in significant impacts toSection 4(f) resources, since the <strong>Improvement</strong> <strong>Program</strong>’s direct impact (physical use) of Section 4(f) resourceswould be more than minimal and its indirect impact (constructive use) substantially impairs Section 4(f) property.5.9.3 MethodologyThe FAA considers the specific criteria to determine whether an action would result in a physical orconstructive use. 394 Refer to Chapter 7, Final Section 4(f)/Section 6(f) Evaluation, Section 7.3, Methodology for adetailed description of these criteria.5.9.4 Impact AssessmentThis section provides a summary of the Section 4(f) resources impact assessment for the No-Action Alternativeand Alternatives B2 and B4 in 2015, 2020, and 2025. Refer to Chapter 7, Final Section 4(f)/Section 6(f) Evaluation,for the complete impact analysis for Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) resources.5.9.4.1 No-Action AlternativeThis section describes impacts to Section 4(f) resources as a result of the No-Action Alternative.Direct ImpactsUnder the No-Action Alternative, Winslow Park, a Section 4(f) recreational resource, would be directly impacted.Winslow Park is a 31.7-acre public recreational park comprised of softball and soccer playing fields, twoplaygrounds, a walking trail/passive recreation area, a concession building with a restroom, and parking, located on394 Environmental Desk Reference for <strong>Airport</strong> Actions, FAA, October 5, 2007.Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequences 5-183 July 2011\\mawatr\ev\09228.00\reports\<strong>FEIS</strong>_Final_July_2011\<strong>PVD</strong>_CH05_Environmental_Cons_JUL_2011.doc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!