11.07.2015 Views

T.F. Green Airport Improvement Program - FEIS Chapters - PVD

T.F. Green Airport Improvement Program - FEIS Chapters - PVD

T.F. Green Airport Improvement Program - FEIS Chapters - PVD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

T.F. <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Airport</strong> <strong>Improvement</strong> <strong>Program</strong>Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation6.21.8.3 Mitigation Site 5This site has been added for Alternative B2 only. It is a wetland restoration site adjacent to the Pawtuxet Riverin Cranston.6.21.8.4 Mitigation Site 6This site would be expanded to approximately 1.0 acres for Alternative B2 with the target cover type forestedwetland.6.21.8.5 Mitigation Site 7This wetland restoration/creation site is located within the exit ramp infield that includes filled wetlands. Thissite is only being considered for mitigation for Alternative B2. This mitigation site would replace the waterquality function of Wetland I lost due to the construction of Fully Relocated <strong>Airport</strong> Road.Table 6-21Alternative B2: Wetland Mitigation Estimated AcreageWetland Mitigation TypeWetland MitigationSite NumbersCompensation SiteArea (acres) 1USACE New England DistrictRecommended Ratio 2Impacted WetlandArea EquivalentCreation/Restoration (In Kind) 3 1, 3, 5, 6, & 7 7.3 2.59:1 4 2.8Restoration/Enhancement (In Kind) 3 0.2 3:1 0.1Wetland/Buffer Preservation 8 & 12 44.0 15:1 2.9Total 44.9 NA 5.1 51 The mitigation program will replace the functions and values of the impacted wetlands as required by USACE.2 Weighted average for all wetland classes impacted from New England District Compensatory Mitigation Guidance (7-20-2010) Table 1.3 PEM dominated by Phragmites will not be replaced in kind.4 The mitigation equivalent of a creation/restoration site is calculated by dividing the area of the site by 2.59.5 Alternative B2 would require mitigation for the loss of 5.8 acres of wetland.The mitigation program for Alternative B2 requires more sites than Alternative B4 to achieve its goal due to thegreater area of wetland impact and the greater amount of forested wetland impacted (3.4 acres forAlternative B2 versus 0.2 acres for the Preferred Alternative). A mitigation program including more sites wouldbe proposed to compensate for the impacts associated with Alternative B2.6.21.9 Water QualityBased on the impact analysis presented in Chapter 5, Environmental Consequences, there are no significantimpacts on water quality as a result of Alternative B2. There would be no significant impacts to water quality,although there would be increases in impervious surfaces within some drainage areas for Alternatives B2 andB4 and lost water quality function of some wetlands as described above. Proposed stormwater mitigationmeasures developed in compliance with all applicable regulatory standards, including the RIDEM 2010Stormwater Design and Installation Standards Manual, would address the water quality impacts and ensure thereceiving waters would not be impacted from new discharges.Alternative B2 would have greater water quality impacts than Alternative B4 due to a substantial increase inroadway and parking areas. Alternative B2 requires greater overall new impervious area and would have a newstormwater discharge to Spring <strong>Green</strong> Pond from the Fully Relocated <strong>Airport</strong> Road. Alternative B2 would resultChapter 6 – Mitigation 6-50 July 2011\\Mawatr\ev\09228.00\reports\<strong>FEIS</strong>_Final_July_2011\<strong>PVD</strong>_CH06_Mitigation_JUL_2011.doc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!