11.07.2015 Views

T.F. Green Airport Improvement Program - FEIS Chapters - PVD

T.F. Green Airport Improvement Program - FEIS Chapters - PVD

T.F. Green Airport Improvement Program - FEIS Chapters - PVD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

T.F. <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Airport</strong> <strong>Improvement</strong> <strong>Program</strong>Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) Evaluationold and hatched during spawning season) alewife could in turn impact the productivity of downstream aquatichabitats. This impact could be mitigated with an appropriate culvert replacement (see Chapter 6, Mitigation).The construction of Fully Relocated <strong>Airport</strong> Road would bisect a 7.6-acre block of forested wetland habitat in themiddle of dense residential development. <strong>Airport</strong> property north of Spring <strong>Green</strong> Pond provides a wildlife corridorto this area. The habitat fragmentation associated with the road construction would further diminish the wildlifehabitat that remains after construction.Other indirect impacts to terrestrial habitats would be concentrated at the northern end of the <strong>Airport</strong> at theRunway 23 extension in an area that is managed as part of the VMP. The movement of small mammals, reptiles, andamphibians through wetland corridors associated with Upper Buckeye Brook, Spring <strong>Green</strong> Pond, or the Spring<strong>Green</strong> Brook Inlet would not be affected. The new AMF Access Road through Wetland A5 would further fragmentthis wetland by introducing additional vehicle traffic to the existing security road and could affect populations ofsmall vertebrates. This area is within the <strong>Airport</strong> security fence and larger mammals are already excluded. Theseindirect impacts are not anticipated to substantially diminish local biodiversity.Table 5-121Alternative B2: Impacts to Aquatic HabitatsAquatic ResourceStream LengthAltered(linear feet)Habitat inStudy Area(linear feet)PercentUnaltered Effects of Alteration Species ImpactedSpring <strong>Green</strong> Brook 0 1,088 100% No alteration NoneUpper Buckeye Brook 0 2,206 100% No alteration NoneLower Buckeye Brook 142 2,598 95% Minor relocation of fish runstream, minor loss ofstream habitatBuckeye Brook below Warwick Pond 0 6,746 100% No alteration NoneSpring <strong>Green</strong> Pond Inlet Stream 121 2,020 94% Loss of poor qualityintermittent stream bedhabitatTributary A11 510 2,240 77% Loss of poor qualityintermittent stream bedhabitatTotal Stream Altered 773Altered Fish Run Stream 142Source: VHB, Inc.Alewife, warm-water fish,and macroinvertebratesMacroinvertebratesMacroinvertebratesChapter 5 - Environmental Consequences 5-230 July 2011\\mawatr\ev\09228.00\reports\<strong>FEIS</strong>_Final_July_2011\<strong>PVD</strong>_CH05_Environmental_Cons_JUL_2011.doc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!