11.07.2015 Views

T.F. Green Airport Improvement Program - FEIS Chapters - PVD

T.F. Green Airport Improvement Program - FEIS Chapters - PVD

T.F. Green Airport Improvement Program - FEIS Chapters - PVD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

T.F. <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Airport</strong> <strong>Improvement</strong> <strong>Program</strong>Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) EvaluationTable 5-102Alternative B2: Federal Wetland Areas ImpactedWetland IDEmergent(acres)Emergent(Phragmites)(acres)Scrub-shrub(acres)Forested(acres)Total(acres)Waterway (linearfeet)A2A3A4A5A6A8A10A11A13IP00000.90.100.400000000.30000.10000.10 200.400.100001.1001.50000.200.50.11.10.101.51.60.10.10.60.10.50.1121 100142 3000510 4000Total 1.4 0.4 0.6 3.4 5.8 7731 The 121 linear feet of intermittent would be in culvert under Fully Relocated <strong>Airport</strong> Road. A small temporary impact to Spring <strong>Green</strong> Pond Inlet stream may alsooccur to install conduit for navigational aids beneath the streambed.2 Temporary impact of less than 0.1 acres to install conduit for navigational aids beneath this wetland and streambed. This area would be restored in place.3 Buckeye Brook, approximately 30-linear feet would be placed in culvert and 112-linear feet of existing channel relocated.4 Approximately 340-linear feet of intermittent stream would be placed within new culvert, and 170-linear feet would be relocated to a new channel.NB: Cover types with impact areas less than 0.05 acres are included in the area of the principal cover type impacted.Table 5-103 Alternative B2: State-Regulated Freshwater Wetland Types Impacted 1Swamp Pond/Wetland Complex River/StreamWetland ID (acres) (acres) (linear feet)A2 1.1 2 0 121A3 0 0.1 0A4 0 2 0 0A5 1.5 0 142 3A6 1.6 0 0A8 0.1 0 0A10 0.1 0 0A11 0.6 0 510 4A13 0.1 0 0I 0.5 0 0P 0.1 0 0Total 5.7 0.1 7731 There would be approximately 12.5 acres of additional impact to riverbank and/or perimeter wetland not reported in this table. These resource areas aredimensional setbacks from vegetated wetlands, streams and/or rivers. Overlap among these “buffers” from proximate wetlands preclude an accounting to eachwetland or watercourse. An additional 0.2 acres of floodplain outside of other state-regulated freshwater wetlands would also be impacted based on the HEC RASmodel prepared to identify state-regulated floodplain. Impacts to this state-regulated floodplain are considered in Section 5.14, Floodplains.2 There would also be temporary impact of less than 0.1 acres to install conduit for navigational aids below wetland and streambeds in these two wetlands. Thetemporary impact areas would be restored in place.3 Buckeye Brook, approximately 30-linear feet would be placed in culvert and 112-linear feet of existing channel relocated.4 Approximately 340-linear feet would be placed within new culvert, and 170-linear feet would be relocated to a new channel.Chapter 5 - Environmental Consequences 5-197 July 2011\\mawatr\ev\09228.00\reports\<strong>FEIS</strong>_Final_July_2011\<strong>PVD</strong>_CH05_Environmental_Cons_JUL_2011.doc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!