11.07.2015 Views

T.F. Green Airport Improvement Program - FEIS Chapters - PVD

T.F. Green Airport Improvement Program - FEIS Chapters - PVD

T.F. Green Airport Improvement Program - FEIS Chapters - PVD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

T.F. <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Airport</strong> <strong>Improvement</strong> <strong>Program</strong>Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f) EvaluationTable 2-5Annual Enplaned Passengers per Gate Method – 2010 <strong>FEIS</strong> No-Action Alternative andBuild Alternative Forecasts2010 <strong>FEIS</strong> No-ActionForecast Enplaned Build Forecast Enplaned Passenger Enplanements Estimated GateYear Passengers 1 Passengers 2 per Gate Requirement 32004 2,754,593 n/a 125,209 22 42015 2,637,438 3,020,302 125,209 21-242020 2,922,399 3,306,311 125,209 23-262025 3,259,654 3,675,621 125,209 26-29n/a = not applicable; 2004 represents existing conditions prior to the implementation of any potential Build Alternative.Sources: Vanasse Hangen Brustlin (2010).1 Forecast based on existing infrastructure and facilities at T.F. <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Airport</strong>.2 Forecast includes 2010 <strong>FEIS</strong> No-Action Alternative Forecast and Incremental Build Alternative Forecast. The extension to Runway 5-23 for Alternative B4 would be implemented by 2015. Alternative B2, including extending Runway 5-23, would be implemented by 2020. The facility requirements analysis provided in thischapter only considers the 2015 implementation of the Build Alternatives (see Table 2-2).3 Includes range from 2010 <strong>FEIS</strong> No-Action Forecast to <strong>FEIS</strong> Build Forecast in the future years.4 There are currently 22 gates at the terminal.Annual Departures per Gate MethodThis method applies the ratio of annual departures per gate for the existing EIS year (1,841 annual air carrier andcommuter aircraft departures per gate based on 2004) to the EIS future study years, and assumes that the currentusage and utilization of the gates will remain constant over the EIS study timeframe. Table 2-6 shows the results ofthe analysis of the annual departures per gate method using the 2010 <strong>FEIS</strong> Forecast. The analysis using this methodshows that additional gates may not be required during the EIS study years.Table 2-6Annual Departures per Gate Method – 2010 <strong>FEIS</strong> No-Action Alternative and Build AlternativeForecasts2010 <strong>FEIS</strong> No-Action <strong>FEIS</strong> Build Forecast AirForecast Air Carrier and Carrier and CommuterCommuter Airline Airline Departures 2 Estimated GateYear Departures 1 Operations per Gate Requirement 32004 40,496 n/a 1,841 22 22015 32,659 37,039 1,841 18-202020 34,708 39,100 1,841 19-212025 36,921 41,301 1,841 20-22n/a = not applicable; 2004 represents existing conditions prior to the implementation of any potential Build Alternative.Sources: Vanasse Hangen Brustlin (2010).1 Forecast based on existing infrastructure and facilities at T.F. <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Airport</strong>; includes Air Carrier and scheduled air taxi departures.2 Forecast includes 2010 <strong>FEIS</strong> No-Action Alternative Forecast and Incremental Build Alternative Forecast. The extension to Runway 5-23 for Alternative B4 would beimplemented by 2015. Alternative B2, including extending Runway 5-23, would be implemented by 2020. The facility requirements analysis provided in this chapteronly considers the 2015 implementation of the Build Alternatives (see Table 2-2).3 Includes range from 2010 <strong>FEIS</strong> No-Action Forecast to <strong>FEIS</strong> Build Forecast in the future years.4 There are currently 22 gates at the terminal.Chapter 2 – Purpose and Need 2-29 July 2011\\mawatr\ev\09228.00\reports\<strong>FEIS</strong>_Final_July_2011\<strong>PVD</strong>_CH02_P&N_JUL_2011.doc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!