12.07.2015 Views

by clicking here. It is a 9.9 Mb file and will take some time to download

by clicking here. It is a 9.9 Mb file and will take some time to download

by clicking here. It is a 9.9 Mb file and will take some time to download

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.1.1: Why an au<strong>to</strong>/biographic case study approach?In keeping with the insights of Michael Polanyi (1962), I have become uncomfortable with theoutcomes of positiv<strong>is</strong>t <strong>and</strong> quantitative methods, the so-called ‘scientific’ approaches (See e.g.Scott, (2000); Dawkins, (2006), “…the dominant form in educational research” (Whitehead <strong>and</strong>McNiff, 2006 p. 4). I have, t<strong>here</strong>fore, selected a combination of methods that are at the ot<strong>here</strong>nd of the research paradigm continuum as articulated <strong>by</strong>, for example, Guba (1990), Elliot(1991), Somekh (1995) <strong>and</strong> Hopkins (2002). My reluctance <strong>to</strong> use surveys, stat<strong>is</strong>tics ormeasurement scales <strong>is</strong> based on the interpretation of apparently ‘raw’ data seeming <strong>to</strong> bedependent on the mindset, prejudices <strong>and</strong> preoccupations of the researchers (e.g. OFSTED,2004; Dawkins 2006, OFSTED 2007). Th<strong>is</strong> <strong>is</strong> a view shared, <strong>and</strong> extended, <strong>by</strong> others workingwith the ‘fuzziness’ of educational practice <strong>and</strong> personal <strong>and</strong> professional development:“The methodology preferred in investigating the problem of underst<strong>and</strong>ing human socialbehaviour, it <strong>is</strong> implied, needs <strong>to</strong> be addressed <strong>by</strong> ‘large scale’ quantitative methods, whichproduce verifiable <strong>and</strong> ‘tested’ data. Tested does not mean the same as true, as theunderst<strong>and</strong>ing arrived at remains partial.” (Reid, 2008 p. 22)Reid’s work - which owes much <strong>to</strong> the men<strong>to</strong>ring of Linden West in Canterbury - has attempted<strong>to</strong> find an approach <strong>to</strong> research that <strong>take</strong>s account of the complexity of human experiencebecause, “... different people <strong>will</strong> construe the world in different ways according <strong>to</strong> their socialviewpoint t<strong>here</strong><strong>by</strong> producing versions of reality” (Reid, ibid). She notes also, within th<strong>is</strong>construct, that it <strong>is</strong> impossible <strong>to</strong> extract the researcher from the research (Reid, 2008 p. 23) <strong>and</strong>goes on <strong>to</strong> make a crucial point for my study:“Rather than trying <strong>to</strong> d<strong>is</strong>tance ourselves or apolog<strong>is</strong>e for our involvement, <strong>by</strong>acknowledging the self in research we can engage with our pre-ex<strong>is</strong>ting underst<strong>and</strong>ings<strong>and</strong> assumptions ...” (Reid, 2008 p. 25)142Simon Hughes Ph.D. Thes<strong>is</strong> (Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2012)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!