by clicking here. It is a 9.9 Mb file and will take some time to download

4.2: Stage 2: Analytical reviews of the five 'theoretically-imbued IMs (a@t 2 )In this second stage of the process, I intend to analyse the IMs reflexively using the questionsthat a journalist might ask: Who? What? When? Where? Why? To do this I have overlain on theraw text, highlighters in different colours so as to create a different look. This is in keeping withthe phenomenological process described in 3.2 which requires analysis from differentperspectives and views. The colour coding system is as follows:Who?What?When?Where?Why?This is a second level of reflection and is designed to look for patterns and trends in the IMs,thereby postulating potentially some 'case study logic' (after Yin, 1994).It is a fact of history that I devised the journalistic approach to the IMs in a tutorial with GlynnKirkham coincidentally at the BETT Show in 2008. It should be noted that the first IM, writtenaround that time, is set out in that form making analysis more straight forward. The method wasattenuated in a tutorial with Mark Hadfield in 2010, following a conversation with Neil Duncanwho advocated the 'stream of consciousness' approach to the recording of the IMs - it should benoted that I have not adopted that mode fully given the consideration made in section 2.2.7 aboutmemory. Accordingly the remaining narratives are written without form or logic which madethe super-imposition of the highlighting a more interesting and potentially more useful exercise.I have applied it in the latter stages of the research process in late 2011. It was only in the first'pass' of the exercise that I was able to define fully what I meant by each category. Before doinga second and more thorough 'pass' through the IMs, I wrote these definitions:225Simon Hughes Ph.D. Thesis (October 2012)