12.07.2015 Views

by clicking here. It is a 9.9 Mb file and will take some time to download

by clicking here. It is a 9.9 Mb file and will take some time to download

by clicking here. It is a 9.9 Mb file and will take some time to download

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2.3 Scientific approaches <strong>to</strong> the ‘Self’Returning briefly <strong>to</strong> Pla<strong>to</strong> <strong>and</strong> Ar<strong>is</strong><strong>to</strong>tle, it <strong>is</strong> possible <strong>to</strong> say that however ineffable, intangible orimmeasurable the self <strong>is</strong>, t<strong>here</strong> <strong>is</strong> indubitable evidence that zoologically selves ex<strong>is</strong>t. Dawkins,pre-eminent among popular natural scient<strong>is</strong>ts, advances empirical <strong>and</strong> quantitative evidence ofthe physical presence of selves (Dawkins, 1978 or Dawkins, 2006). For him t<strong>here</strong> <strong>is</strong> no virtualreality, t<strong>here</strong> <strong>is</strong> only organic matter. The self <strong>is</strong> thus a collection of t<strong>is</strong>sues, formed fromgenetically-controlled reactions, <strong>and</strong> ‘bonded’ <strong>to</strong>gether in a chemically-organ<strong>is</strong>ed manner whichseems <strong>to</strong> have <strong>some</strong>thing <strong>to</strong> do with the functions it needs for the survival <strong>and</strong> perpetuation of itsown genetic identity (Dawkins, 1978 p. 7). In the post-Darwinian d<strong>is</strong>course in which Dawkins’work <strong>is</strong> situated th<strong>is</strong> <strong>is</strong> unproblematic. Outside that paradigm, t<strong>here</strong> remain debates about theverifiability of h<strong>is</strong> theses <strong>and</strong> the reliability of the science on which they are predicated(McGrath, 2007).More helpfully, from within the neuro-scientific community, Damasio writes eloquently aboutthe neurobiology of feelings (Damasio, 2004 p. 101). In so doing, he points <strong>to</strong> the ana<strong>to</strong>my ofthose things, ‘hard’ science has often found it difficult <strong>to</strong> explain, things like beauty, altru<strong>is</strong>m<strong>and</strong> love. Based on a number of ‘scientific experiments’ conducted within labora<strong>to</strong>ry settings <strong>here</strong>ports the physiological modifications that occur when a self <strong>is</strong> experiencing feelings, which heargues are the precursor <strong>to</strong> emotions. Of particular interest <strong>to</strong> th<strong>is</strong> study <strong>is</strong> Damasio’s conclusionthat, “an entity capable of feeling must be an organ<strong>is</strong>m that not only has a body but also means<strong>to</strong> represent that body inside itself” (Damasio, 2004 p.109). Contributing <strong>to</strong> the modificationsdescribed above are hormones, chemicals, electrical impulses <strong>and</strong> secretions all of which areconnected <strong>to</strong> the personal interior l<strong>and</strong>scape of the self being affected <strong>by</strong> external stimuli. Th<strong>is</strong>research would appear <strong>to</strong> validate in absentia, t<strong>here</strong>fore, the belief systems of many, apparently‘quack’, alternative therapies like acupuncture, the manipulation of chakras <strong>and</strong> reiki that49Simon Hughes Ph.D. Thes<strong>is</strong> (Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2012)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!