12.07.2015 Views

by clicking here. It is a 9.9 Mb file and will take some time to download

by clicking here. It is a 9.9 Mb file and will take some time to download

by clicking here. It is a 9.9 Mb file and will take some time to download

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eing the rigid structure that I drew out at the end of chapter 3 with each fac<strong>to</strong>r in equal measure,I have <strong>to</strong> acknowledge now that the framework needs <strong>to</strong> be seen more loosely, flexibly <strong>and</strong>proportionately. A latterly-emerging finding (in metaphorical terms) <strong>is</strong> of the 'elasticity' of theframework which stretches, reshapes, comes <strong>and</strong> goes according <strong>to</strong> the degree of N-ness evincedin each IM. Thus a pic<strong>to</strong>rial representation of IM3 might look more like that at figure 28, iffigure 27 <strong>is</strong> an hypothetical IM w<strong>here</strong> the Ns were in equal proportions:Figure 27: Ns in equal proportionFigure 28: N 3 DominantTh<strong>is</strong> latter insight need not dimin<strong>is</strong>h the potential power of the framework, indeed it may addfurther strength. I would argue now that in IM1 N 1 <strong>is</strong> pre-dominant, in the strictest sense of theword <strong>and</strong> that N 4 was only of minimal significance <strong>and</strong> relevance since it was only inexperimental contexts (i.e. the sanctuary of my home or office) that I was attempting <strong>to</strong> applynewly-acquired knowledge, skills or underst<strong>and</strong>ing in new contexts. (see figure 29 below).273Simon Hughes Ph.D. Thes<strong>is</strong> (Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2012)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!