Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP
Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP
Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sanitation</strong> <strong>Interventions</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong> | Local Benefits <strong>of</strong> Improved <strong>Sanitation</strong> and HygieneThere is almost no difference between the regions when itcomes to op<strong>in</strong>ions on the importance <strong>of</strong> environmentalsanitation (see Figure 31). This could be expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> severalways: respondents honestly assess these criteria highlyand equally; respondents are uncritical when provid<strong>in</strong>gtheir scores; or <strong>in</strong>terviewers have not clearly expla<strong>in</strong>ed themean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> each criterion. From the FGDs, it is obviousthat people see the importance <strong>of</strong> all these criteria, but thatthey are not sure about the different weight<strong>in</strong>g they shouldplace on each.FIGURE 31: IMPORTANCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION STATE, BY OPTION TYPE (1 = VERY BAD, 5 = VERY GOOD)Uncollected/undisposedHH wasteOpen, visible wastewaterAccumulation <strong>of</strong> stormwaterSmell from sewage,defecation and wasteDust and dirt <strong>in</strong> streetsor alleysDust and dirt <strong>in</strong> marketsor restaurantsRodents <strong>in</strong> markets, shopsor restaurantsInsects0 1 2 3 4 5Urban North Rural North Urban Central Rural Central Urban South Rural South62<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sanitation</strong> <strong>Interventions</strong>
Change language