Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam | Annex TablesTABLE J26. RURAL AREA EFFICIENCY MEASURES FOR MAIN SANITATION INTERVENTION GROUPINGS, COMPARING DIFFERENTPOINTS ON THE SANITATION LADDEREfficiencymeasureProgramsincludedper optionScenarioCOST-BENEFIT MEASURESWet pitlatrineto septictankR2, R3, R4,R7, R9Wet pitlatrineto clusterWWTWet pitlatrineto doublevaultcompostingWet pitlatrineto biogasdigesterSeptic tankto clusterWWTSeptic tanktodouble-vaultcompostingSeptic tankto biogasdigesterR7 R3, R9 R1, R4 R7 R3, R9 R4Benefitsper VNDinputIdeal 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.4 0.7 0.9 0.1Actual 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.2Internalrate ofreturn (%)Ideal - - - - - - -Actual - - - - - - -Pay-backperiod(years)Ideal >20 >20 >20 >20 >20 >20 >20Actual >20 >20 >20 >20 >20 >20 >20Net presentvalue (VND)Ideal (8,142,719) (10,398,691) (13,514,962) (8,486,991) (1,565,768) (4,792,667) (19,446,950)Actual (4,697,028) (6,789,939) (10,144,067) (4,376,254) (2,048,356) (4,456,402) (9,358,367)COST-EFFECTIVENESS MEASURESCost perDALYaverted(VND)Ideal - - - - - - -Actual - - - - - - 329,582,399Cost percaseaverted(VND)Ideal (2,008,896) - - - - (358,320) -Actual (1,564,703) - (644,995,022) - - (373,923) -Cost perdeathaverted(VND)Ideal 1,156,469,316 1,225,452 - - 330,289 292,110,810 -Actual 821,597,288 1,535,226 - - 546,033 290,930,845 -220Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions
Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam | Annex TablesTABLE J27. EFFICIENCY MEASURES FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROJECT IN BAC GIANG PROVINCE (U6)Efficiency measureCOST-BENEFIT MEASURESBenefits per VND inputInternal rate of return (%)Pay-back period (years)Net present value (VND)ScenarioIntervention: from ‘No solid waste management’ to ‘Collection anddumping in unsanitary landfill’Ideal 3.7Actual 1.8Ideal >100%Actual 204%Ideal 20Ideal 6,500,822Actual 970,272TABLE J28. EFFICIENCY MEASURES FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROJECT IN HANOI CITY (U7)Efficiency measureScenarioIntervention: from ‘No solid waste management’ to ‘Collection anddumping in unsanitary landfill’COST-BENEFIT MEASURESBenefits per VND inputIdeal 1.40Actual 0.86Internal rate of return (%)Ideal 51.93%Actual -Pay-back period (years)Ideal 20Net present value (VND)Ideal 3,819,545Actual -1,537,173TABLE J29. EFFICIENCY MEASURES FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROJECT IN CUA LO TOWN, NGHE AN PROVINCE (U8)Efficiency measureScenarioIntervention: from ‘Collection and dumping in sanitary landfill’ to‘Collection and dumping in unsanitary landfill’COST-BENEFIT MEASURESBenefits per VND inputIdeal 4.53Actual 2.52Internal rate of return (%)Ideal >100%Actual >100%Pay-back period (years)Ideal
Page 3:
Economic Assessment ofSanitation In
Page 9:
Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 17:
ForewordTarget 10 of the Millennium
Page 22 and 23:
Glossary of TermsBenefit-cost ratio
Page 24 and 25:
AcknowledgmentsThe Economics of San
Page 27 and 28:
V. National Benefits of Improved Sa
Page 29 and 30:
Table 32. Sanitation coverage, and
Page 31:
Figure 34. What factors were of mos
Page 34 and 35:
Annex Table E1. Level of satisfacti
Page 36 and 37:
Annex Table J1. Site U1 (Dong Thap,
Page 38 and 39:
PopulationSelected Development Indi
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
III.Study MethodsThe study methodol
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
IV.Local Benefits of Improved Sanit
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
VI.Costs of Improved Sanitationand
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
ReferencesAcharya A, Paunio MK and
Page 152 and 153:
ANNEX 1: PROGRAM APPROACH ANALYSIST
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
ANNEX TABLESANNEX A. STUDY METHODST
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208: Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 219: Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
show all

Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?