Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam | Annex TablesTABLE A11. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON SELECTED URBAN FIELD SITESVariable U1 U2 U3 U4 U5 U6 U7 U8Name Sa dec town Tam Ky city Hai Phong city Bai Chay town BMT city Thang town Hanoi city Cua LotownRural/urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban UrbanHouseholds 2,170 4,169 175,000 80,000 17,000 2,500 18,200 11,600Population 9,327 17,511 0.7 mio. 330,000 65,000 10,750 72,820 48,730Av. householdsizeAv. Children 90% 87% SWcollectionincreasedfrom 70% to100%18% NA NA NA NA NA NA NAAusaid:A$49.98mio. for 3provincesGoV:A$28.34 mio.Integrated,communitybased:water supplysystems,HH watertank, ST,IEC, SWM,Institutionalsupport, IEC6 wards,includingpoor5/2005 –5/2008JFPR: $1mio.GoV:$140,000Community:$60,000Infrastructureimprovement(drainage,road), watersupply for200 HHs,HH toiletsfor 300HHs, SWM,IEC6 wards,includingpoor2001 – 2007 2001 - 2007 2001 – 2007 1998 – now 12/2006 –nowFinnish Gov.$7.26 mio,WB loan $25.5mio., GoV$11.9 mio.Infrastructureimprovement(drainage,pumping station,ponds &lakes), septictank andconnectionimprovement,ST emptying,septage treatment,revolvingfund, IEC,managementcapacity300,000 HHsbenefited;7,227 HHsinvolved inrevolving fundprogram per 2mio. per HHGrant: $10.86mio, Loan:$20.28 mio.,GoV: $5.59 mio.Infrastructureimprovement(pumping station,WWTP),septic tank andconnectionimprovement,septage treatment,SWM withlandfills, revolvingfund, IEC,managementcapacityWW treatmentfor 1 ward in BC(93,000 persons)+ 6 wards inHG (100,000persons). SWMimprovementfor 330,000persons.11,504 HHsinvolved inrevolving fundprogramGrant;DKK121.2 mio;GoV: DKK25.0mio.Infrastructureimprovement(drainage, lowcostsewerage,pumping station,WWTP),HH connection,SWM,school toilets,IEC, managementcapacity5,500 HHsbenefited(21,000 persons)fromtotal 17,000HHsEstablishmentof Environ.Sani.Cooperative,solid wastecollectionand disposal,IECWhole area inthe townJapan:JPY 435.5mio; GoV:VND1,429mio.URENCOcapacitybuilding,IEC, sourceseparation,compostingor organicwasteAll HHs in 4pilot wards4/2004 –7/2007Grant:DKK1.6 mio.URENCOcapacitybuilding,IEC, jobcreation for120 poor,SW collectionanddisposal7 wards andcommunes138Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions
Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam | Annex TablesTABLE A12. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON SELECTED RURAL FIELD SITESVariable R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9NameRural/urbanHouseholdsPopulationAv. householdsizeAv.Children 80% + 40% + 40.5 and42.8%NA NA NA NA + 40% NAPlan: $1.17mio, GoV:$100,000,HHs:$126,000HH toilets,water supply,IEC,capacitybuilding forserviceproviders10,000HH toilets,2,000 HHwater supplyfacilitiesover 16communesin 3 districts.In TinhDong: 745from 1,528HHs (50%)SupportVND0.55mio. perHH, HHinvestedVND10 –20 mio.per biogassystem700 HHsfrom 2,800HHs over 4villages2003 - 2004 1998 – now 2002 – 2008 2004 – 2008 2001 –2005IDE(marketingsanitation):$150,000;HHs:$397,400Demandcreationthrough IECand capacitybuilding forproviders54,000HHs from30 communesin 6districts of2 provinces(Thanh Hoaand QuangNam). Toiletsincreasedfrom 8,637to 9,361IEC,Technical& financialsupportfor biogasconstructionEstablishmentof Environ.Sani.Cooperative,solidwaste collectionanddisposal,IECWhole areain the wardYWAM: VND0.8bio. GoV: 0.33bio., localcontrib.VND0.85bio.Improvementof drainage,constructionof demonstrationHH toilets,construction ofcluster WWTP,SW separation,collection andcomposting, IECWhole areain the village,including poorVND405mio. for biogassystemand elect.generatorConstructionofbiogasand pondsystem forpig manuretreatment,electricitygenerationSupport0.55 mio.per HHtoiletSupport forHH toiletimprovement,IEC,schooltoilets, constructionofdemonstrationtoilet,etc.3 communes.Whole program(2001– 2005): 20provinces,budgetVND400 –600 mio.per yearwww.wsp.org139
Page 3:
Economic Assessment ofSanitation In
Page 9:
Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 17:
ForewordTarget 10 of the Millennium
Page 22 and 23:
Glossary of TermsBenefit-cost ratio
Page 24 and 25:
AcknowledgmentsThe Economics of San
Page 27 and 28:
V. National Benefits of Improved Sa
Page 29 and 30:
Table 32. Sanitation coverage, and
Page 31:
Figure 34. What factors were of mos
Page 34 and 35:
Annex Table E1. Level of satisfacti
Page 36 and 37:
Annex Table J1. Site U1 (Dong Thap,
Page 38 and 39:
PopulationSelected Development Indi
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
III.Study MethodsThe study methodol
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
IV.Local Benefits of Improved Sanit
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
VI.Costs of Improved Sanitationand
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126: Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 127: Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 149 and 150: ReferencesAcharya A, Paunio MK and
Page 152 and 153: ANNEX 1: PROGRAM APPROACH ANALYSIST
Page 166 and 167: ANNEX TABLESANNEX A. STUDY METHODST
Page 219: Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
show all

Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?