Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam | Annex TablesTABLE D8. PREFERENCES RELATED TO TOILET CONVENIENCE, FROM HOUSEHOLD QUESTIONNAIRE - RURAL SITES(MAX = 5; MIN = 0)(CONT.)VINH LONGSitePerceived benefits of sanitation (B6.1): proximity citedas satisfied or very satisfiedThose with toiletThose without toiletComfortable toilet position 4.4 4.9Cleanliness and freedom from unpleasant odors and insects 4.5 4.9Privacy when using the toilet 4.5 4.8Proximity of toilet to house 4.5 4.9A feeling of status from having an attractive toilet facility 4.3 4.9Feeling good about your toilet facility when you have friends and otherguests at your homeWork/maintenance of the toilet disposal system (pit, septic tank,sewer)Pollution of your, your neighbors’, or your community’s environmentfrom the toilet disposal system (pit, septic tank, sewer)QUANG NAM3.3 4.84.5 4.94.6 4.9Comfortable toilet position 4.6 5Cleanliness and freedom from unpleasant odors and insects 4.7 5Privacy when using the toilet 4.8 5Proximity of toilet to house 4.6 5A feeling of status from having an attractive toilet facility 4.1 5Feeling good about your toilet facility when you have friends and otherguests at your homeWork/maintenance of the toilet disposal system (pit, septic tank,sewer)Pollution of your, your neighbors’, or your community’s environmentfrom the toilet disposal system (pit, septic tank, sewer)QUANG NGAI3.3 54.4 54.8 5Comfortable toilet position 4.6 5Cleanliness and freedom from unpleasant odors and insects 4.5 5Privacy when using the toilet 4.5 4.5Proximity of toilet to house 4.6 5A feeling of status from having an attractive toilet facility 4.1 4Feeling good about your toilet facility when you have friends and otherguests at your homeWork/maintenance of the toilet disposal system (pit, septic tank,sewer)Pollution of your, your neighbors’, or your community’s environmentfrom the toilet disposal system (pit, septic tank, sewer)3.7 3.64.4 4.64.6 5170Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions
Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam | Annex TablesTABLE D8. PREFERENCES RELATED TO TOILET CONVENIENCE, FROM HOUSEHOLD QUESTIONNAIRE - RURAL SITES(MAX = 5; MIN = 0)(CONT.)AVERAGE RURALSitePerceived benefits of sanitation (B6.1): proximity cited as satisfied or very satisfiedThose with toiletThose without toiletComfortable toilet position 4.3 4.7Cleanliness and freedom fromunpleasant odors and insects4.3 4.8Privacy when using the toilet 4.4 4.6Proximity of toilet to house 4.3 4.7A feeling of status from having anattractive toilet facilityFeeling good about your toilet facilitywhen you have friends and otherguests at your homeWork/maintenance of the toiletdisposal system (pit, septic tank,sewer)Pollution of your, your neighbors’, oryour community’s environment fromthe toilet disposal system (pit, septictank, sewer)4.0 4.63.5 4.34.2 4.74.4 4.7TABLE D9. AVERAGE TIME SAVED PER YEAR, BY URBAN HOUSEHOLD MEMBER (HOURS)Site Household Adult time with young children Per average householdHai Phong 219.0 36.5 255.5Tam Ky 589.7 71.4 661.1Dong Thap 0.0 0.0 0.0BMT 0.0 0.0 0.0Quang Ninh 0.0 0.0 0.0Average Urban 1,586.7 157.3 1,744.0TABLE D10. AVERAGE TIME SAVED PER YEAR, BY RURAL HOUSEHOLD MEMBER (HOURS)Site Household Adult time with young children Per average householdHanoi 707.4 48.8 756.2Dan phuong 0.0 0.0 0.0Hue 1,317.3 76.7 1,394.0Vinh Long 0.0 0.0 0.0Quang Nam 1,460.0 85.2 1,545.2Quang Ngai 640.6 57.2 697.8Average rural 1,130.6 52.1 1,182.7www.wsp.org171
Page 3:
Economic Assessment ofSanitation In
Page 9:
Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 17:
ForewordTarget 10 of the Millennium
Page 22 and 23:
Glossary of TermsBenefit-cost ratio
Page 24 and 25:
AcknowledgmentsThe Economics of San
Page 27 and 28:
V. National Benefits of Improved Sa
Page 29 and 30:
Table 32. Sanitation coverage, and
Page 31:
Figure 34. What factors were of mos
Page 34 and 35:
Annex Table E1. Level of satisfacti
Page 36 and 37:
Annex Table J1. Site U1 (Dong Thap,
Page 38 and 39:
PopulationSelected Development Indi
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
III.Study MethodsThe study methodol
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
IV.Local Benefits of Improved Sanit
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
VI.Costs of Improved Sanitationand
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
ReferencesAcharya A, Paunio MK and
Page 152 and 153:
ANNEX 1: PROGRAM APPROACH ANALYSIST
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159: Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 166 and 167: ANNEX TABLESANNEX A. STUDY METHODST
Page 207: Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 259 and 260:
show all

Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?