Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Annex Table J1. Site U1 (Dong Thap, urban) efficiency measures for main sanitationintervention groupings, compared to “no toilet” ................................................... 205Annex Table J2. Site U2 (Quang Nam, urban) efficiency measures for main sanitationintervention groupings, compared to “no toilet” ................................................... 205Annex Table J3. Site U3 (Hai Phong, urban) efficiency measures for main sanitationintervention groupings, compared to “no toilet” ................................................... 206Annex Table J4. Site U4 (Quang Ninh, urban) efficiency measures for main sanitationintervention groupings, compared to “no toilet” ................................................... 206Annex Table J5. Site U5 (Dak Lak, urban) efficiency measures for main sanitation interventiongroupings, compared to “no toilet”....................................................................... 207Annex Table J6. Site R1 (Dong Nai, rural) efficiency measures for main sanitation interventiongroupings, compared to “no toilet” ...................................................................... 207Annex Table J7. Site R2 (Vinh Long, rural) efficiency measures for main sanitation interventiongroupings, compared to “no toilet” ...................................................................... 208Annex Table J8. Site R3 (Quang Ngai, rural) efficiency measures for main sanitationintervention groupings, compared to “no toilet” ................................................... 208Annex Table J9. Site R4 (Dan Phuong, rural) efficiency measures for main sanitationintervention groupings, compared to “no toilet” ................................................... 209Annex Table J10. Site R5 (Quang Nam, rural) efficiency measures for main sanitationintervention groupings, compared to “no toilet” ................................................... 209Annex Table J11. Site R7 (Lai Xa, rural) efficiency measures for main sanitation interventiongroupings, compared to “no toilet” ...................................................................... 210Annex Table J12. Site R8 (Thanh Hoa, rural) efficiency measures for main sanitationintervention groupings, compared to “no toilet” ................................................... 210Annex Table J13. Site U1 (Dong Thap, urban) efficiency measures for main sanitationintervention groupings, comparing different points on the sanitation ladder .......... 211Annex Table J14. Site U2 (Quang Nam, urban) efficiency measures for main sanitationintervention groupings, comparing different points on the sanitation ladder .......... 211Annex Table J15. Site U3 (Hai Phong, urban) efficiency measures for main sanitationintervention groupings, comparing different points on the sanitation ladder .......... 212Annex Table J16. Site U4 (Quang Ninh, urban) efficiency measures for main sanitationintervention groupings, comparing different points on the sanitation ladder .......... 212Annex Table J17. Site U5 (Dak Lak, urban) efficiency measures for main sanitation interventiongroupings, comparing different points on the sanitation ladder............................. 213Annex Table J18. Site R1 (Dong Nai, rural) efficiency measures for main sanitation interventiongroupings, comparing different points on the sanitation ladder ............................ 213Annex Table J19. Site R2 (Vinh Long, rural) efficiency measures for main sanitation interventiongroupings, comparing different points on the sanitation ladder ............................ 214Annex Table J20. Site R3 (Quang Ngai, rural) efficiency measures for main sanitationintervention groupings, comparing different points on the sanitation ladder........... 215xxxivEconomic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions
Annex Table J21. Site R4 (Dan Phuong, rural) efficiency measures for main sanitationintervention groupings, comparing different points on the sanitation ladder .......... 216Annex Table J22. Site R7 (Lai Xa, rural) efficiency measures for main sanitation interventiongroupings, comparing different points on the sanitation ladder ............................ 217Annex Table J23. Summary of all urban sites: efficiency measures for main sanitationintervention groupings, compared to “no toilet” ................................................... 217Annex Table J24. Summary of all rural sites: efficiency measures for main sanitationintervention groupings, compared to “no toilet” ................................................... 218Annex Table J25. Urban area efficiency measures for main sanitation intervention groupings,comparing different points on the sanitation ladder .............................................. 219Annex Table J26. Rural area efficiency measures for main sanitation intervention groupings,comparing different points on the sanitation ladder .............................................. 220Annex Table J27. Efficiency measures for solid waste management project in Bac Giangprovince (U6)........................................................................................................ 221Annex Table J28. Efficiency measures for solid waste management project in Hanoi city (U7).......... 221Annex Table J29. Efficiency measures for solid waste management project in Cua Lo town,Nghe An province (U8)......................................................................................... 221Annex Table J30. Efficiency measures for solid waste management project in Hiep Hoadistrict, Bac Giang province (R6) .......................................................................... 222www.wsp.orgxxxv
Page 3: Economic Assessment ofSanitation In
Page 9: Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 12 and 13: Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 17: ForewordTarget 10 of the Millennium
Page 22 and 23: Glossary of TermsBenefit-cost ratio
Page 24 and 25: AcknowledgmentsThe Economics of San
Page 27 and 28: V. National Benefits of Improved Sa
Page 29 and 30: Table 32. Sanitation coverage, and
Page 31: Figure 34. What factors were of mos
Page 34 and 35: Annex Table E1. Level of satisfacti
Page 38 and 39: PopulationSelected Development Indi
Page 46 and 47: III.Study MethodsThe study methodol
Page 60: Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 70 and 71: IV.Local Benefits of Improved Sanit
Page 87 and 88:
Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
VI.Costs of Improved Sanitationand
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
ReferencesAcharya A, Paunio MK and
Page 152 and 153:
ANNEX 1: PROGRAM APPROACH ANALYSIST
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
ANNEX TABLESANNEX A. STUDY METHODST
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
show all

Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?