Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam | Annex TablesTABLE J3. SITE U3 (HAI PHONG, URBAN) EFFICIENCY MEASURES FOR MAIN SANITATION INTERVENTION GROUPINGS,COMPARED TO “NO TOILET”Efficiency measureCOST-BENEFIT MEASURESBenefits per VND inputInternal rate of return (%)Pay-back period (years)Net present value (VND)COST-EFFECTIVENESS MEASURESCost per DALY averted (VND)Cost per case averted (VND)Cost per death averted (VND)ScenarioSanitation onlyOD to septic tankSanitation andhygieneSanitation onlyOD to WWMSanitation andhygieneIdeal 1.7 2.0 1.8 2.0Actual 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.7Ideal 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.5Actual 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.4Ideal 3.2 2.6 3.6 3.1Actual 3.7 2.9 4.4 3.6Ideal 16,574,997 21,811,442 19,871,033 23,888,820Actual 11,917,596 16,876,601 14,103,408 17,904,688Ideal 62,107,830 19,708,898 21,258,035 18,626,139Actual 68,998,912 21,090,728 24,233,182 21,067,961Ideal 866,196 1,260,865 1,293,545 1,886,499Actual 962,303 1,435,510 1,474,582 2,203,649Ideal 456,034,542 379,826,834 400,308,603 349,368,207Actual 506,633,175 417,826,622 456,333,391 395,095,073TABLE J4. SITE U4 (QUANG NINH, URBAN) EFFICIENCY MEASURES FOR MAIN SANITATION INTERVENTION GROUPINGS,COMPARED TO “NO TOILET”Efficiency measureCOST-BENEFIT MEASURESBenefits per VND inputInternal rate of return (%)Pay-back period (years)Net present value (VND)COST-EFFECTIVENESS MEASURESCost per DALY averted (VND)Cost per case averted (VND)Cost per death averted (VND)ScenarioSanitation onlyOD to septic tankSanitation andhygieneOD to septic tank with WWMSanitation onlySanitation andhygieneIdeal 1.6 1.8 2.5 2.7Actual 1.4 1.5 2.2 2.4Ideal 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.6Actual 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.6Ideal 3.1 2.5 3.1 2.8Actual 3.9 3.0 3.4 3.0Ideal 15,341,362 20,662,420 27,382,239 31,453,495Actual 9,358,827 14,395,350 21,947,289 25,796,500Ideal 68,033,647 21,604,906 15,684,438 13,841,812Actual 73,209,282 23,241,187 16,298,322 14,387,297Ideal 947,640 1,379,968 952,831 1,399,090Actual 1,019,732 1,484,482 990,124 1,454,226Ideal 500,457,925 417,200,817 295,890,433 260,103,432Actual 538,530,080 448,798,168 307,471,490 270,353,717206Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions
Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam | Annex TablesTABLE J5. SITE U5 (DAK LAK, URBAN) EFFICIENCY MEASURES FOR MAIN SANITATION INTERVENTION GROUPINGS, COMPAREDTO “NO TOILET”Efficiency measureCOST-BENEFIT MEASURESBenefits per VND inputInternal rate of return (%)Pay-back period (years)Net present value (VND)COST-EFFECTIVENESS MEASURESCost per DALY averted (VND)Cost per case averted (VND)Cost per death averted (VND)ScenarioSanitation onlyOD to WWMSanitation and hygieneIdeal 1.8 1.9Actual 1.6 1.7Ideal 1.3 1.9Actual 0.9 1.0Ideal 1.8 1.6Actual 2.2 2.1Ideal 24,930,956 29,789,822Actual 18,747,800 23,341,668Ideal 22,667,413 19,879,837Actual 25,486,800 22,332,820Ideal 1,370,972 1,998,293Actual 1,541,494 2,244,863Ideal 429,759,861 375,435,472Actual 483,213,664 421,760,654TABLE J6. SITE R1 (DONG NAI, RURAL) EFFICIENCY MEASURES FOR MAIN SANITATION INTERVENTION GROUPINGS, COMPAREDTO “NO TOILET”Efficiency measureCOST-BENEFIT MEASURESBenefits per VND inputInternal rate of return (%)Pay-back period (years)Net present value (VND)COST-EFFECTIVENESS MEASURESCost per DALY averted (VND)Cost per case averted (VND)Cost per death averted (VND)ScenarioSanitation onlyOD to pit latrineSanitation andhygieneOD to biogas digesterSanitation onlySanitation andhygieneIdeal 4.1 4.7 2.7 3.1Actual 3.6 4.1 2.5 2.8Ideal >100% >100% 0.6 0.8Actual >100% >100% 0.6 0.7Ideal
Page 3:
Economic Assessment ofSanitation In
Page 9:
Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 17:
ForewordTarget 10 of the Millennium
Page 22 and 23:
Glossary of TermsBenefit-cost ratio
Page 24 and 25:
AcknowledgmentsThe Economics of San
Page 27 and 28:
V. National Benefits of Improved Sa
Page 29 and 30:
Table 32. Sanitation coverage, and
Page 31:
Figure 34. What factors were of mos
Page 34 and 35:
Annex Table E1. Level of satisfacti
Page 36 and 37:
Annex Table J1. Site U1 (Dong Thap,
Page 38 and 39:
PopulationSelected Development Indi
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
III.Study MethodsThe study methodol
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
IV.Local Benefits of Improved Sanit
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
VI.Costs of Improved Sanitationand
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
ReferencesAcharya A, Paunio MK and
Page 152 and 153:
ANNEX 1: PROGRAM APPROACH ANALYSIST
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
ANNEX TABLESANNEX A. STUDY METHODST
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194: Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 219: Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 254: Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
show all

Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?