Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP
Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP
Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sanitation</strong> <strong>Interventions</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong> | Annex TablesTABLE E8. OPEN DEFECATION PRACTICES AMONG POPULATION WITH IMPROVED SANITATIONOD None/never Sometimes/little Moderate Pervasive TotalLai Xa 83 15 1.5 0.5 100Dan Phuong 94.9 4.0 0 1.0 100Quang N<strong>in</strong>h 45.2 43.0 7.5 4.3 100Hai Phong 46.5 36.6 16.8 0 100Quang Nam R 2.1 14.0 65.3 18.7 100Hue 10.6 32.8 43.4 13.1 100Quang Ngai 9.4 63.9 22.2 4.4 100Quang Nam U 26.5 38.8 32.7 2.0 100V<strong>in</strong>h Long 79.6 14.7 5.8 0 100Dong thap 30.6 48.0 12.2 9.2 100Daclak 67.9 25.7 6.4 0 100TABLE E9. PERCEPTIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION, BY SITE (1 = VERY BAD; 5 = VERY GOOD)Perceptions <strong>of</strong>environmentalsanitation stateUncollected/undisposedhousehold wasteOpen, visible sewage orwastewaterAccumulation <strong>of</strong> ra<strong>in</strong> andstorm waterSmell from sewage,defecation and wasteDust and dirt <strong>in</strong> streets,or alleysDust and dirt <strong>in</strong> markets,or restaurantsRodents markets, shopsor restaurantsLai XaDanPhuongQuangN<strong>in</strong>hHaiPhongQuangNam RHueQuangNgaiQuangNam UV<strong>in</strong>hlongDongthap3 3.4 4.7 4.1 4.2 3.6 4.5 3.7 4.2 4.3 2.43.0 3.9 4.7 4.2 4.0 3.3 4.2 3.4 3.8 4.0 2.529 3.7 4.7 4.2 4.0 3.2 4.4 3.8 3.9 3.9 2.63.1 3.8 4.6 4.7 4.1 3.4 4.4 3.6 4.2 4.1 2.73.3 4.1 4.7 4.3 4.5 3.6 4.4 3.6 4.4 3.9 2.63.3 4.1 4.7 4.0 4.5 3.7 4.5 3.5 4.3 3.9 2.83.0 4.1 4.7 3.6 4.3 3.6 4.4 3.6 4.2 3.9 2.7Insects 2.9 4.3 4.7 3.6 4.4 3.7 4.3 3.4 4.3 3.9 2.6Daklakwww.wsp.org177
Change language