Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam | Annex TablesTABLE H20. INCREMENTAL COSTS OF MOVING UP THE SANITATION LADDER, RURAL SITES (VND, 2009)Site and baseline sanitation optionWetpit latrineSeptic tankTarget sanitation optionClusterWW treatmentDouble-vaultcompostingtoilet (DVCT)BiogasdigesterR1: DONG NAI 1,860,000 13,210,000Wet pit latrine 11,350,000Biogas digesterR2: VINH LONG 1,434,125 5,238,750Wet pit latrine 3,804,625Septic tankR3: QUANG NGAI 2,142,500 5,813,877 3,806,617Wet pit latrine 3,671,377 1,664,117Septic tank -2,007,260Double-vault CompostingR4: DAN PHUONG 3,020,000 5,789,000 9,656,609Wet pit latrine 2,769,000 6,636,609Septic tank 3,867,609Biogas digesterR5: QUANG NAM 1,058,000 3,851,617Wet pit latrine 2,793,617Septic tankR7: LAI XA 1,894,125 6,537,691 9,256,357Wet pit latrine 4,643,566Septic tank 2,718,667Cluster WW treatmentR8: THANH HOA 1,441,000,000Biogas digesterR9: TT - HUE 1,825,000 4,540,000 2,940,000Wet pit latrine 2,715,000 1,115,000Septic tankDouble-vault Composting* 2,940,000AVERAGE, RURAL SITESFrom pit latrine to 3,400,000 1,390,000 8,993,000From DVCT to 2,940,000From septic tank 2,719,000 3,868,000* Cost for Double-vault Composting toilet (DVCT) is cheaper than for septic tank. Economic value of DVCT is higher thanks to reuse values, but usersoften prefer to move to the septic tank for convenience and due to other reasons.202Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions
Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam | Annex TablesANNEX I. PROGRAM APPROACH ANALYSISTABLE I1. FINANCING FROM URBAN HOUSEHOLD AND PROJECT SOURCESSiteNumber ofhouseholdsinterviewedHousehold contributionValue of household inputsYes No Cash Labor MaterialsProject valueinputHai Phong 102 61.1 1.1 8,471,186 N/A N/A 2,908,475Tam Ky 98 38.6 5.7 735,294 N/A N/A 3,187,856Dong Thap 100 12.5 1.3 1,230,000 N/A N/A 1,122,727Buon Me Thuot 220 4.6 4.6 780,000 N/A N/A 1,260,000Quang Ninh 100 0 0 0 N/A N/AAverage Urban 18.8 2.9 4,822,124 N/A N/A 2,674,887TABLE I2. FINANCING FROM RURAL HOUSEHOLD AND PROJECT SOURCESSiteNumber ofhouseholdsinterviewedHousehold contributionValue of household inputsYes No Cash Labor MaterialsProject valueinputLai Xa, Hanoi 200 7.2 1.6 941,500 N/A N/A 2,000,000Dan Phuong, HN 101 39.4 0 9,118,421 N/A N/A 912,820.5Hue 200 66.0 6.0 1,360,917 N/A N/A 820,535.7Vinh Long 201 8.1 2.0 2,500,000 N/A N/A 4,230,769Quang Nam 200 0 0 0 N/A N/AQuang Ngai 200 67.7 2.0 2,000,092 N/A N/A 520,990.6Average rural 29.8 2.0 3,150,532 N/A N/A 943,094.4www.wsp.org203
Page 3:
Economic Assessment ofSanitation In
Page 9:
Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 17:
ForewordTarget 10 of the Millennium
Page 22 and 23:
Glossary of TermsBenefit-cost ratio
Page 24 and 25:
AcknowledgmentsThe Economics of San
Page 27 and 28:
V. National Benefits of Improved Sa
Page 29 and 30:
Table 32. Sanitation coverage, and
Page 31:
Figure 34. What factors were of mos
Page 34 and 35:
Annex Table E1. Level of satisfacti
Page 36 and 37:
Annex Table J1. Site U1 (Dong Thap,
Page 38 and 39:
PopulationSelected Development Indi
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
III.Study MethodsThe study methodol
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
IV.Local Benefits of Improved Sanit
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
VI.Costs of Improved Sanitationand
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
ReferencesAcharya A, Paunio MK and
Page 152 and 153:
ANNEX 1: PROGRAM APPROACH ANALYSIST
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
ANNEX TABLESANNEX A. STUDY METHODST
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190: Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 219: Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
Page 254: Economic Assessment of Sanitation I
show all

Economic Assessment of Sanitation Interventions in Vietnam - WSP

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?